NVIDIA Setup on FC2

Stephan Cote stepcote at numericable.fr
Thu May 20 11:39:01 UTC 2004


Here the way i was able to setup the NVIDIA (with 3D support) on FC2
while running a AMD64 Setup

1. Go on the web and get this file :
http://www.sh.nu/download/nvidia/linux-2.6/NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-1.0-5332-pkg0.run
2. Run the file, don't select to check for an update on nvidia website
and compile it
3. Modify the xconf.org file: change nv to nvidia
4. Remove the Load "dri" line

On my side, it was not working good the first time
(enable to load nvidia module) so i just type on a shell session:
(of course, youmust be loggued as <<root>>)
cd /sbin
./modprobe nvidia

Now, i have a woopping 3890 FPS with a GeForce FX 5600 256Mo
Hoping it will also work with you guys.

Have fun.!

By the way, does someone can help me a bit on this.

While executing up2date, FC2 always reset my Thomsom Cable modem ?
Any suggestion will be welcome!

The cable modem work fine with Mandrake, W2K, Xandros, Redhat...
Only Fedora always reset it

 
On Thu, 2004-05-20 at 11:32, fedora-list-request at redhat.com wrote:
> Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to
> 	fedora-list at redhat.com
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	fedora-list-request at redhat.com
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	fedora-list-owner at redhat.com
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Re: Fetching news for INN (Colin Paul Adams)
>    2. Help docs (Reuben Gouws)
>    3. sshd config - WAS Secure entry into remote systems (Edward)
>    4. Re: Fedora Core 2 - Can't get mail, download or browse web
>       pages (Steven P. Ulrick)
>    5. Re: sshd config - WAS Secure entry into remote systems
>       (Nathan Ollerenshaw)
>    6. Re: Fedora Core 2 - Can't get mail, download or browse web
>       pages (Simon Andrews)
>    7. Re: Opinion: NVIDIA drivers are a BAD Thing [tm]
>       (Rui Miguel Seabra)
>    8. nvidia and FC2 (Chris Jones)
>    9. FC2:  KDE won't start up due to shared library error
>       (bdw at briandwright.com)
>   10. Re: nvidia and FC2 (Rui Miguel Seabra)
>   11. Re: Apache 2.0.49 reading >2GB files. (Joe Orton)
>   12. Re: nvidia and FC2 (Chris Jones)
>   13. Unofficial FAQ Updated for Fedora Core 2 (Max K-A)
>   14. Re: Help docs (Sanjeewa Wijerathne)
>   15. [FC2] Can't find repositories with xmms-MP3... (Coume - Lubox.com)
>   16. Re: Fedora Core 2 weird Xkb & mouse problem (Alberto Goldoni)
>   17. FC 2 Download (Sanjeewa Wijerathne)
>   18. Re: [FC2] Can't find repositories with xmms-MP3... (Mihai Maties)
>   19. FC2 - Firefox/Mozilla confusion (Dave Cross)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: 20 May 2004 09:11:31 +0100
> From: Colin Paul Adams <colin at colina.demon.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: Fetching news for INN
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <m37jv7seks.fsf at colina.demon.co.uk>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> >>>>> "Michael" == Michael Schwendt <fedora at wir-sind-cool.org> writes:
> 
>     Michael> On 19 May 2004 18:25:03 +0100, Colin Paul Adams wrote:
>     >> After having problems upgrading from FC1 to FC2, I decided to
>     >> do a fresh install. Of course, I kept my /home partition, and
>     >> archived /etc.
>     >> 
>     >> But I forgot about the program I used to fetch the news. In
>     >> fact, I forget what program it was (I had a shell script called
>     >> getnews, but I forget what program it invoked).
> 
>     Michael> "suck" maybe?
> 
> That was it. Thanks.
> -- 
> Colin Paul Adams
> Preston Lancashire
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 10:12:51 +0200
> From: "Reuben Gouws" <reuben at rentmenow.co.za>
> Subject: Help docs
> To: <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <KAEHLLLAMLJDDEBIBEEMGEFNCOAA.reuben at rentmenow.co.za>
> Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> I'm on the lookout for some fedora config doc's.
> Also configuring and installing Webmin.
> 
> As you can see I'm a newby.
> 
> Cheers
> Reuben
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 16:24:51 +0800
> From: Edward <edward at tripled.iinet.net.au>
> Subject: sshd config - WAS Secure entry into remote systems
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <40AC6B53.5060607 at tripled.iinet.net.au>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
> 
> 
> 
> Scot L. Harris wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 00:59, Edward wrote:
> > 
> >>I have several servers installed at customer's premises. I used to 
> >>simply run out there to fix any slight problems or update mail white 
> >>lists etc.
> >>
> >>However, with a few customers more than 1.5 hours drive away, I need to 
> >>look at remote administration. Especially for simply adding few users to 
> >>a spamassassin white list or the like, which really only are 10 minute jobs.
> >>
> >>So, I was thinking about setting up dyndns or no-ip addresses for these 
> >>servers, then opening up the firewall for either ssh or VPN. None of my 
> >>customers have a static internet address.
> > 
> > 
> > In your place I would setup ssh.  The thing you need to make sure of is
> > if you are using password authentication that all your passwords are
> > good ones.  I believe you may want to lock down ssh to specific known
> > hosts and keys.  Even if you need to administer multiple systems
> > remotely use one to ssh to and then ssh from that one to the others. 
> > Also disable roots use of ssh so no one can go straight in as root. 
> > Means you will login as a normal user then su to root as needed.
> > 
> > Over those dialup lines you are not going to be doing any X-windows
> > forwarding or other GUI tricks, but command line should be fine.
> > 
> 
> OK, I need some more clarification here please. After reading all the 
> suggestions, I'd like to set up shared key authentication.
> 
> After reading mountains of stuff on the internet, I can't get this to work.
> 
> The client is PuTty if that makes a difference.
> 
> 1> Used PuTtygen.exe to create a key pair with a pass phrase.
> 2> saved both keys into a folder on the client PC.
> 3> Copied the PUBLIC key to $HOME/.ssh/authorized_keys on the ssh server 
> (FC1 with all updates).
> 4> Modified sshd.conf to disallow text passwords, disallow root log ins, 
> and to accept key pair authentication using challenge response.
> 5> Restarted sshd (ofcourse :) )
> 6> Started putty, loading up the private key from the local hard drive
> 
> It asks for my user name, which I fill in.
> 
> At this point from what I understand and from the reading I've done, 
> it's SUPPOSED to ask me my pass phrase. However, it asks for a password 
> instead, which, ofcourse, fails because I've disallowed password 
> authentication.
> 
> 7> Just to make sure I didn't misunderstand the location of 
> authorized_keys, I copied it to ~/.ssh and /.ssh as well and re-did 
> steps above from 5>
> 
> I just can't get it to work. What am I missing?
> 
> Regards,
> Ed.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 03:36:54 -0500
> From: "Steven P. Ulrick" <ulrick2 at faith4miracle.org>
> Subject: Re: Fedora Core 2 - Can't get mail, download or browse web
> 	pages
> To: fedora-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <20040520033654.340d73d8.ulrick2 at faith4miracle.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> 
> On Thu, 20 May 2004 03:02:50 -0500
> "Steven P. Ulrick" <ulrick2 at faith4miracle.org> wrote:
> 
> > Hello, Everyone :)
> 
> > In summary, the undesirable behavior (FC2) looks like this:
> > 1. Fresh install (not an upgrade) of Fedora Core 2.  (I haven't
> > applied the updates that are available yet.  From my brief perusal of
> > them when I downloaded the FC2 images, I don't think they are related
> > to this problem anyway)  In addition, I chose to install Every
> > Package. (Over 6 gigabytes)
> > 2. Reboot after installation completes, and first thing, try to
> > connect to the internet.  No Joy :(  Can't load websites, can't check
> > mail.
> > 
> > Also, as an experiment, I chose to not configure a firewall.  This had
> > no effect on the problem.  Still can't load websites or check mail.
> > 
> > 
> > In contrast, I also reinstalled Fedora Core 1 on a separate harddrive
> > (right before my reinstall of FC2) and I had the following results
> > while attempting to browse the internet:
> > 1. Fresh install (not an upgrade) of FC1.  No updates applied.  I
> > chose to install Every Package.
> > 2. Reboot after installation and attempt to connect to the internet. 
> > Full Joy :)  Every browser works, mail works.
> > 
> 
> > 
> > Have a Great Day :)
> > Steven P. Ulrick
> 
> Hello, Everyone :)
> Major OOps :(  I forgot to mention what kind of modem I use: US
> Robotics, 56k, internal PCI, v92
> 
> Have a Great Day :)
> Steven P. Ulrick
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 5
> Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 17:32:47 +0900
> From: Nathan Ollerenshaw <nathan at valuecommerce.co.jp>
> Subject: Re: sshd config - WAS Secure entry into remote systems
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <BCD29C3F.7BCE%nathan at valuecommerce.co.jp>
> Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="US-ASCII"
> 
> On 5/20/04 5:24 PM, "Edward" <edward at tripled.iinet.net.au> wrote:
> 
> > OK, I need some more clarification here please. After reading all the
> > suggestions, I'd like to set up shared key authentication.
> 
> You mean, Public key authentication.
> 
> > After reading mountains of stuff on the internet, I can't get this to work.
> > 
> > The client is PuTty if that makes a difference.
> > 
> > 1> Used PuTtygen.exe to create a key pair with a pass phrase.
> > 2> saved both keys into a folder on the client PC.
> > 3> Copied the PUBLIC key to $HOME/.ssh/authorized_keys on the ssh server
> > (FC1 with all updates).
> 
> Make sure that the public key is in the format
> 
>  ssh-rsa [key string] <comment - usuall user at host>
> 
> I know puttygen will by default create a different style key, you can
> manually convert it to the format above. It needs to be on one line.
> 
> Also, make sure ~/.ssh is mode 0700 and authorized_keys is 0600. Other
> permissions can cause problems (not sure if this is the case these days, but
> I do it anyway because you don't want other people looking in your .ssh dir
> anyway).
> 
> Nathan.
> 
> -- 
> Nathan Ollerenshaw - Unix Systems Engineer
> ValueCommerce - http://www.valuecommerce.ne.jp/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 6
> Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 09:38:45 +0100
> From: Simon Andrews <simon.andrews at bbsrc.ac.uk>
> Subject: Re: Fedora Core 2 - Can't get mail, download or browse web
> 	pages
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <40AC6E95.3000608 at bbsrc.ac.uk>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
> 
> Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
> 
> > Here's the problem: to all appearances, I can (using Kppp) connect to
> > the internet like always have.  I even can "connect" at the speeds that
> > I usually connect at (45333 and 49000)  Problem is, I cannot load any
> > web pages (I've tried Konqueror, Mozilla and Lynx) or get my mail
> > (Sylpheed)
> 
> > Here are a few lines from when I ran "ping" on my internet providers
> > address, followed by the summary line:
> > 
> > PING 12.148.211.65 (12.148.211.65) 56(84) bytes of data.
> > 64 bytes from 12.148.211.65: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=89.7 ms
> > --- 12.148.211.65 ping statistics ---
> > 112 packets transmitted, 111 received, 0% packet loss, time 111137ms
> > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 84.994/92.441/307.962/21.718 ms, pipe 2
> > 
> > As you can see, all of the packets were received.
> > 
> > Also, as an experiment, I chose to not configure a firewall.  This had
> > no effect on the problem.  Still can't load websites or check mail.
> 
> OK, if you can ping your ISP then the connection's OK.  There are still 
> a couple of simple things to check
> 
> 1) Can you ping an IP address other than your ISP?  If not then the 
> problem is probably that your default gateway hasn't been set.
> 
> When you are connected run "/sbin/route -n" and check that there is a 
> default gatway entry.  For your system there should be an entry which 
> reads (the second IP address should match the IP at the ISP end of your 
> ppp connection):
> 
> 0.0.0.0   12.148.211.65    0.0.0.0      UG   0    0     0 ppp0
> 
> If this isn't, there then that's your problem.  This should be added by 
> ppp when you connect, but you can try manually adding it with
> 
> /sbin/route add default gw 12.148.211.65
> 
> 2) If you can ping an external IP address, can you ping an address by 
> name?  If not then it's probably a DNS problem.
> 
> When you're connected check /etc/resolv.conf and see that there are some 
> nameserver entries.  Check these against your working configuration and 
> see if there's anything different.
> 
> Hope this gets you a bit further.
> 
> Simon.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 7
> Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 09:43:30 +0100
> From: Rui Miguel Seabra <rms at 1407.org>
> Subject: Re: Opinion: NVIDIA drivers are a BAD Thing [tm]
> To: fedora-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <1085042610.2575.0.camel at roque>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 22:55 -0700, Alan wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 09:10, Jonathan Gardner wrote:
> > I was under the assumption that their hardware accelerated drivers were
> > closed source.
> 
> ATI distributes proprietary drivers, AFAICT.
> 
> The Free Software drivers are included with your X server.
> 
> Rui
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 189 bytes
> Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
> Url : /archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040520/3d76e113/attachment.bin
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 8
> Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 09:55:53 +0100
> From: Chris Jones <jonesc at hep.phy.cam.ac.uk>
> Subject: nvidia and FC2
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <40AC7299.5000102 at hep.phy.cam.ac.uk>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Doe anyone have any idea when nvidia is likely to release new drivers 
> compatible with FC2 (i.e. the 4kstack problem) ?
> 
> Also, does anyone know of anywhere what has put together non-standard 
> FC2 kernel rpms with the fc4kstack removed such that the current 5336 
> nvidia driver will work ? I know I could compile a kernel myself but 
> I've never done that myself and figure I will probably screw things up 
> the first few times.
> 
> cheers Chris
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 9
> Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 04:57:34 -0400 (EDT)
> From: bdw at briandwright.com
> Subject: FC2:  KDE won't start up due to shared library error
> To: fedora-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID:
> 	<32982.63.231.26.186.1085043454.squirrel at www.briandwright.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
> 
> When I try to start KDE on FC2, I get the following error in my
> ~/.xsession-error file:
> 
> startkde: Starting up...
> ksplash: error while loading shared libraries:
> /usr/lib/qt-3.3/lib/libqt-mt.so.3: undefined symbol:
> XkbSetPerClientControls
> kdeinit: error while loading shared libraries:
> /usr/lib/qt-3.3/lib/libqt-mt.so.3: undefined symbol:
> XkbSetPerClientControls
> startkde: Could not start kdeinit. Check your installation.
> xmessage: error while loading shared libraries:
> /usr/X11R6/lib/libXaw.so.7: undefined symbol: XmuCvtGravityToString
> Warning: connect() failed: : No such file or directory
> ksmserver: error while loading shared libraries:
> /usr/lib/qt-3.3/lib/libqt-mt.so.3: undefined symbol:
> XkbSetPerClientControls
> startkde: Shutting down...
> Warning: connect() failed: : No such file or directory
> Error: Can't contact kdeinit!
> startkde: Running shutdown scripts...
> startkde: Done.
> 
> The right packages were installed, I just can't figure out why the there's
> an undefined symbol error.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 10
> Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 09:59:42 +0100
> From: Rui Miguel Seabra <rms at 1407.org>
> Subject: Re: nvidia and FC2
> To: fedora-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <1085043582.2575.97.camel at roque>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> On Thu, 2004-05-20 at 09:55 +0100, Chris Jones wrote:
> > Doe anyone have any idea when nvidia is likely to release new drivers 
> > compatible with FC2 (i.e. the 4kstack problem) ?
> 
> Ask NVIDIA, they're the only one entity who can help you.
> 
> Rui
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 189 bytes
> Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
> Url : /archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040520/7fd70e28/attachment.bin
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 11
> Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 10:00:08 +0100
> From: Joe Orton <jorton at redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: Apache 2.0.49 reading >2GB files.
> To: Naoki <naoki at valuecommerce.com>
> Cc: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <20040520090008.GA16880 at redhat.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> 
> On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 04:14:48PM +0900, Naoki wrote:
> > 
> > >>I thought Apache 2 had LFS support from the outset?
> > >No, it didn't.
> > Doh.  Ok, but there are third party patches for LFS even going back to 
> > 1.3.x tree.
> 
> They aren't patches per se, you just use a compiler macro.
> 
> > From : http://www.apacheweek.com/features/vendorversions
> > 
> > "Large File Support
> > 
> > Debian, Mandrake, SuSE, and SCO build Apache with Large File support, so 
> > that on 32-bit systems Apache can use files larger than 2 gigabytes - 
> > this is particularly useful for log files. Enabling LFS does slightly 
> > change the Apache 1.3 binary module ABI, which can cause problems if 
> > using binary modules built against a different version of Apache."
> 
> I don't think either Mandrake or Debian build with LFS enabled in the
> 2.0 packages.  It *completely* changes the binary module interface in 
> 2.0; it wasn't such a big deal in 1.3.
> 
> (in fact, building 2.0 for LFS doesn't work until 2.0.49; we had that
> bug reported upstream from someone using the SuSE packages who found
> that they were subtly broken)
> 
> Regards,
> 
> joe
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 12
> Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 10:09:23 +0100
> From: Chris Jones <jonesc at hep.phy.cam.ac.uk>
> Subject: Re: nvidia and FC2
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <40AC75C3.7050301 at hep.phy.cam.ac.uk>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
> 
> 
> > Ask NVIDIA, they're the only one entity who can help you.
> 
> Well I've poked about on their web site and forums as much as I can and 
> not found anything. I could email them I suppose, but guessed they 
> probably get lots on this issue so I wouldn't hold up much hope for a 
> fast reply. I was hoping someone had some insider knowledge, or just 
> more than me..
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 13
> Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 02:12:05 -0700
> From: Max K-A <max_list at fedorafaq.org>
> Subject: Unofficial FAQ Updated for Fedora Core 2
> To: fedora-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <1085044325.21882.9.camel at max.localdomain>
> Content-Type: text/plain
> 
> 	With the efforts of Sindre Pedersen Bjordal and Gareth Russell,
> combined with several hours of my editing and doing HTML stuff, we now
> have an Unofficial FAQ for Fedora Core 2!! :-)
> 
> 	You can see it in action at http://www.fedorafaq.org/
> 
> 	Please be aware that for the next few days, this FAQ is definitely in
> "beta" status -- it does not have answers to all the questions it will
> eventually have, and the yum.conf is not updated perfectly, yet. There
> will be significant updates tomorrow and the next day.
> 
> 	However, it should be functional for most usage. :-)
> 
> 	Please, let me know what you think of the new design, and if you have
> any comments on the questions or answers, let me know!! You can contact
> me as max <at> fedoraforum {d0t} org.
> 
> 	When I think the FAQ is in a more finished state, I'll also see if I
> can get a message on fedora-announce. :-)
> 
> 	-Max
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 14
> Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 14:52:57 +0600
> From: Sanjeewa Wijerathne <sun at sanjeewa.org>
> Subject: Re: Help docs
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <40AC71E9.4080100 at sanjeewa.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
> 
> Reuben Gouws wrote:
> 
> >Also configuring and installing Webmin.
> >  
> >
> Get Webmin from
> http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/webadmin/webmin-1.140-1.noarch.rpm
> 
> --sanjeewa
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 15
> Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 09:19:36 GMT
> From: "Coume - Lubox.com" <coume.mailinglists at lubox.com>
> Subject: [FC2] Can't find repositories with xmms-MP3...
> To: fedora-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <E1BQjiD-00066x-6t at fetch-bak.runbox.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I finally have FC2 on my computer and it works like a charm :) it seems quicker to, perhaps it's just a dream :)
> 
> Anyway, I added dag, newrpms and fedora.us repositories but none of them have the package to allow my computer to play mp3, have you got any idea on which repositories I could find them???
> 
> thanks in advance
> Ludo
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 16
> Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 11:23:04 +0200
> From: "Alberto Goldoni" <alberto.goldoni at joinetspa.com>
> Subject: Re: Fedora Core 2 weird Xkb & mouse problem
> To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <opr8akcqw3cyxen6 at smtp.joinetspa.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-1
> 
> the same problem after fc1 upgrade to fc2.
> I solved by reinstalling fc2 from scratch
> 
> > Rami Saarinen wrote:
> > [...]
> >>  If I switch on Gnome, I get an error  "Error activating XKB  
> >> configuration.
> >> Probably internal X server problem.
> >>  X server version data:
> >> The X.Org Foundation
> >> 60700000
> >>  If you report this situation as a bug, please include:
> >> - The result of xprop -root | grep XKB
> >> - The result of gconftool-2 -R /desktop/gnome/peripherals/keyboard/xkb
> >>  "
> >>  xprop stuff says: _XKB_RULES_NAMES_BACKUP(STRING) = "xfree86",  
> >> "pc102", "fi", "", ""
> >> _XKB_RULES_NAMES(STRING) = "xfree86", "pc102", "fi", "", ""
> >>  and gconftool-2 says:
> >> layouts = [fi]
> >>  model = pc105
> >>  overrideSettings = false
> >>  options = []
> >>
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> Any ideas? I am pretty much in a dead-end by myself so any kind of
> >> pointers  are appreciated!
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >
> >> Rami Saarinen
> >
> > I'm experiencing the exact same symptoms, and have filed a bug at  
> > bugzilla.
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=123626
> >
> > The error does not occur when I log in using KDE, however.
> >
> > Clint
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 17
> Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 15:08:07 +0600
> From: Sanjeewa Wijerathne <sun at sanjeewa.org>
> Subject: FC 2 Download
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <40AC7577.2080909 at sanjeewa.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> 
> Hi all,
> Im trying to download FC2  using my ADSL link since 18 and still I have 
> "finishing in 299:49:00 (12.3%)" on bittorrent screen :-(. Can you give 
> me a fast link to download. Im in Sri Lanka/Asia.
> 
> --sanjeewa.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 18
> Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 12:31:58 +0300
> From: Mihai Maties <mihai at xcyb.org>
> Subject: Re: [FC2] Can't find repositories with xmms-MP3...
> To: coume.mailinglists at lubox.com,	For users of Fedora Core releases
> 	<fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <200405201231.58993 at xcyb0rg>
> Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> On Thursday 20 May 2004 12:19, Coume - Lubox.com wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I finally have FC2 on my computer and it works like a charm :) it seems
> > quicker to, perhaps it's just a dream :)
> >
> > Anyway, I added dag, newrpms and fedora.us repositories but none of them
> > have the package to allow my computer to play mp3, have you got any idea on
> > which repositories I could find them???
> 
> Check http://rpm.livna.org.
> 
> 
> Mihai
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 19
> Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 10:32:33 +0100
> From: Dave Cross <dave at dave.org.uk>
> Subject: FC2 - Firefox/Mozilla confusion
> To: fedora-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <20040520093233.GA2790 at mag-sol.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> I've upgraded a system from FC1 to FC2. I've also installed Dag's latest
> FC2 rpm for Firefox. But everytime I try to start Firefox I get Mozilla
> instead. This happens whether I open it from the menu, from the icon on
> my gnome panel or if I run it from the command line.
> 
> Has anyone else seen this behaviour? Is there a fix?
> 
> It's not that I don't like Mozilla, but I'd rather have Firefox :)
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave...





More information about the fedora-list mailing list