[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

RE:xstartup config file



Anyone have an xstartup file configuration that works for realvnc?  I am having a bunch of trouble getting gnome
to my vnc client.      It worked fine for me in red hat 9.... is there some security stuff that I am missing
that has been added to FC2?

Here is my xstartup config file as it is now...
It doesn't work... I just get a blank grey screen
**********************************************************************************
#!/bin/sh

# Uncomment the following two lines for normal desktop:
unset SESSION_MANAGER
exec /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc

[ -x /etc/vnc/xstartup ] && exec /etc/vnc/xstartup
[ -r $HOME/.Xresources ] && xrdb $HOME/.Xresources
xsetroot -solid grey
vncconfig -iconic &
xterm -geometry 80x24+10+10 -ls -title "$VNCDESKTOP Desktop" &
gnome-session &
***************************************************************************************
Michael Marsh
m mmm7 com


> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: fedora-list Digest, Vol 3, Issue 324
> From: fedora-list-request redhat com
> Date: Fri, May 21, 2004 8:25 am
> To: fedora-list redhat com
> 
> Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to
> 	fedora-list redhat com
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	fedora-list-request redhat com
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	fedora-list-owner redhat com
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Re: Windows XP Pro & FC2 - XP won't boot (John Chapman)
>    2. Re: Fedora Core2 -> Enterprise (David Gavin)
>    3. Re: Lucent Winmodem (Chadley Wilson)
>    4. Re: rhythmbox/gstreamer mp3 support (Douglas Furlong)
>    5. Re: nvidia and FC2 (jerry)
>    6. Re: Simple RealPlayer/Multimedia Solution (Gregory Gulik)
>    7. Re: stable Fedora releases? (Jack Howarth)
>    8. Re: stable Fedora releases? (Douglas Furlong)
>    9. FC/2 constantly reboots when trying to install (Grobe)
>   10. Installing Fedora Core 2 on Virtual PC (Mike McCollister)
>   11. Re: stable Fedora releases? (Phil Schaffner)
>   12. Installation problem (Jiri Kanak)
>   13. Re: nvidia and FC2 (Rui Miguel Seabra)
>   14. Re: stable Fedora releases? (Jack Howarth)
>   15. Re: stable Fedora releases? (Will Backman)
>   16. Re: Fedora Core2 -> Enterprise (Phil Schaffner)
>   17. startup programs? (Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak)
>   18. RE: i2o - howto install? (-=Brian Truter=-)
>   19. Re: nvidia and FC2 (Luc Bouchard)
>   20. Multiple speed problems (Michael)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 11:00:39 -0400
> From: John Chapman <chapmanj myrealbox com>
> Subject: Re: Windows XP Pro & FC2 - XP won't boot
> To: fedora-list redhat com
> Message-ID: <40AE1997 9000906 myrealbox com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> 
> I have had this exact same issue.
> 
> Go into your BIOS and change the hard drive access modes of both hard 
> drives to LBA not AUTO,  after installing FC2 the bios will try to 
> access it in CHS mode which Windows XP doesnt support.
> 
> John Chapman
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 10:42:42 -0400 (EDT)
> From: "David Gavin" <dgavin davegavin com>
> Subject: Re: Fedora Core2 -> Enterprise
> To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list redhat com>
> Message-ID:
> 	<54148 165 236 198 34 1085150562 squirrel dgavin no-ip com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
> 
> 
>   I had to change an RH 8.0 system to RHEL3 recently and ended up
> having
> to do a new install as here was no upgrade option offered during the
> install.
>  Besides, as upgrading to 2.6 seems to be fairly disruptive - I
> wouldn't
> expect to see it offered in RHEL3 for quite a while - probably not
> until
> the next major point release.
> 
>  Dave
> 
> howarth bromo msbb uc edu (Jack Howarth) said:
> >     Is there a rough date yet for the next Enterprise Linux
> > release based off of Fedora Core2? I am setting up a new
> > computational workstation soon and would really like to
> > start off with a Linux 2.6 based release but am afraid
> > installing Fedora Core 2 and then trying to upgrade to
> > the next RedHat Enterprise Linux over that will be a rather
> > messy proposition.
> >             Jack
> >
> >
> > --
> > fedora-list mailing list
> > fedora-list redhat com
> > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 16:58:27 +0200
> From: Chadley Wilson <chadley pinteq co za>
> Subject: Re: Lucent Winmodem
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list redhat com>
> Message-ID: <1085151507 27087 96 camel chadlin pinnacle>
> Content-Type: text/plain
> 
> On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 16:37, John Chapman wrote:
> > I just installed Fedora Core 2 and I cannot find a driver that works
> with the 2.6 kernel for my Lucent WinModem.  Does anyone know where I
> can find an RPM or the source code for 2.6?
> > 
> 
> > John Chapman
> Try www.smlink.com
> -- 
> Chadley - Linux Rocks
> Welcome to my world.
> ******************************************************************
> This mail is free for distribution. You are free to - delete it -
> resend
> it - use it in anyway that makes you happy. I am not responsible for
> it
> or its content due to ignorance.
> Enjoy the adventures of Linux 
> *******************************************************************
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 15:22:26 +0100
> From: Douglas Furlong <douglas furlong firebox com>
> Subject: Re: rhythmbox/gstreamer mp3 support
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list redhat com>
> Message-ID: <1085149345 10346 105 camel localhost localdomain>
> Content-Type: text/plain
> 
> On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 15:08, Davy Brion wrote:
> > On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 14:57, relaxed wrote:
> > >     Rhythmbox still complains with the message, "there is no plugin
> 
> > > installed to handle a MP3 file." I've searched google, mailing
> lists, 
> > > and asked in #fedora but haven't found any answers. The
> gstreamer.spec 
> > > and rhythmbox.spec didn't give me any clues either...
> > >     Thanks for your time.
> > 
> > i think you also need libid3tag... you can get it from freshrpms
> > 
> > i installed libmad, libid3tag, and the gstreamer-plugins-mp3 package
> and
> > then rhythmbox was able to play mp3s just fine
> Is any one aware of how to get the ripping tool Sound juicer to encode
> as MP3?
> 
> Doug
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 5
> Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 11:44:44 -0400
> From: jerry <jerrywone cox net>
> Subject: Re: nvidia and FC2
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list redhat com>
> Message-ID: <40ACD26C 3050302 cox net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> 
> Chris Jones wrote:
> 
> >
> >> Ask NVIDIA, they're the only one entity who can help you.
> >
> >
> > Well I've poked about on their web site and forums as much as I can 
> > and not found anything. I could email them I suppose, but guessed
> they 
> > probably get lots on this issue so I wouldn't hold up much hope for a
> 
> > fast reply. I was hoping someone had some insider knowledge, or just
> 
> > more than me..
> >
> >
> well, people could flood them with requests til they decide to be 
> socially conscious and OPEN them! anybody think that peaking their 
> requests would have any effect on their business practices?
> 
> i went with their chipset and graphics chip, but am regretting the 
> choice.  should have voted with my $$...  unfortunately, i did what was
> 
> on the shelf :-(
> 
> it used to be that you couldn't do anything, but some improvement, FAR
> 
> FROM WHAT IT SHOULD BE.  btw, the two RMSs duking it out on the issue a
> 
> while back, were those really stallman in disguise? ;-)
> 
> jerry
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 6
> Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 09:37:17 -0500
> From: Gregory Gulik <greg gulik org>
> Subject: Re: Simple RealPlayer/Multimedia Solution
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list redhat com>
> Message-ID: <40AE141D 6020708 gulik org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
> 
> 
> Thanks, I tried two different versions off that page but neither work.
> 
> The HelixPlayer gave me an error that it's unable to view that type of
> 
> file and the alpha RealPlayer looked like it was playing but no image
> or 
> sound came was aparent.
> 
> Can you play this link with your player?
> 
> http://www.gagme.com/greg/diving/dive176-15fps-none.ram
> 
> Did you need to install anything special?
> 
> Jack Aboutboul wrote:
> > Hello All,
> > 
> > 	I'm glad to be writing this email.  It seems that many users'
> > multimedia playback issues will be solved by this simple,
> > straight-forward solution.  You can now download an alpha, albeit,
> > pretty stable, version of RealPlayer.  All you need to do is go to
> > http://player.helixcommunity.org/2004/downloads/ and download the
> rpm
> > linked to from the RealPlayer Alpha table.  You will want the Linux
> > x86(Sun JDS, others) one.
> > 	All you need to do is rpm -Uvh, and youll get a nice new RealPlayer
> > which will even install mozilla plugins and a menu entry for you. 
> It
> > even has a native gtk interface.  WOW!!
> > 	It can play the following media formats. Real Audio/Video, Ogg
> Vorbis,
> > Ogg Theora, MP3, SMIL, Flash, MPEG4, RTSP and more.  It also has
> support
> > for Accelerated Video and Fullscreen playback.
> > 	I think it is safe to say, that there is no an easy, simple,
> convenient
> > way to get a way above decent multimedia setup for Fedora. So let it
> be
> > written, so let it be done.
> > 
> > Word,
> > Jack
> > 
> > P.S. For all other media formats, just use mplayer and mozplugger
> and
> > stop crying.
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Greg Gulik                                 http://www.gulik.org/greg/
> greg @ gulik.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 7
> Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 11:10:57 -0400 (EDT)
> From: howarth bromo msbb uc edu (Jack Howarth)
> Subject: Re: stable Fedora releases?
> To: fedora-list redhat com
> Message-ID: <20040521151057 770601DC0EB bromo msbb uc edu>
> 
>    Thanks for all of the replies on this topic.
> I should clarify that I am not as concerned about minor
> glitches in the actual Fedora Core releases but rather
> being able to get timely security updates without de-evolving
> a machine installed with Fedora Core to a test release.
> It seems this is unlikely to be avoided. 
>    I will probably just purchase academic licenses for
> RedHat Enterprise Linux but I would note that RedHat 
> doesn't go out of their way to help you find them on
> their web site. Also, I am still a bit concerned about
> the degree of forking RedHat has introduced with this
> release strategy. Before they had become the reference
> release and scientific software was often marked as
> compatible with a certain RedHat release. Now with
> Fedora this has become a murky target. 
>                                   Jack
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 8
> Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 15:29:27 +0100
> From: Douglas Furlong <douglas furlong firebox com>
> Subject: Re: stable Fedora releases?
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list redhat com>
> Message-ID: <1085149766 10346 109 camel localhost localdomain>
> Content-Type: text/plain
> 
> On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 15:18, Jack Howarth wrote:
> >     Okay, up front I realize that Fedora is a hobbyist release...
> > but the same could be said of Debian. With that said, is there 
> > any plan in place for eventually having a benchmark stable Fedora
> > release which would be equivalent to the Stable branch of Debian?
> > I ask because it is unclear if one will be able to install a Core
> > release and get access to the proper security patches without
> > constantly upgrading Fedora to the point of it reverting back to
> > a Test release (for the next Core of course). I know in the
> > academic environment many folks are looking at Fedora as a successor
> > to RedHat 9 but I am afraid it is more likely to be a Debian
> > Unstable type release at best.
> >                    Jack
> I'm not entirly sure what you are asking.
> 
> However I know that Fedora will be maintaining patches for around 1.5
> release cycles.
> 
> However http://www.fedoralegacy.org/ should be picking up where fedora
> leaves with regards to security patches.
> 
> Doug
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 9
> Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 10:13:36 -0500
> From: Grobe <gary grobe net>
> Subject: FC/2 constantly reboots when trying to install
> To: fedora-list redhat com
> Message-ID: <6ED004A8-AB39-11D8-A31E-00039398C980 grobe net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
> 
> Hey all,
> 
> I just downloaded fedora core 2 and am trying to install it on a new 
> Compaq Presario w/ a 2.7GHz Celeron. Problem is it goes two lines into
> 
> the install and reboots.
> 
> Loading vmlinuz .......
> Loading initrd.img ......... (then reboots at this point)
> 
> I've tried options w/ text, mediacheck, and noprobe and nothing works.
> 
> The cd boots fine if I put it on another machine.
> 
> Any help much appreciated.
> 
> Gary
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 10
> Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 08:15:39 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Mike McCollister <mikemccollister yahoo com>
> Subject: Installing Fedora Core 2 on Virtual PC
> To: Red Hat Fedora LIST <fedora-list redhat com>
> Message-ID: <20040521151539 40942 qmail web11104 mail yahoo com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have tried to install Fedora Core 2 on Virtual PC (in Windows XP) but
> can't
> get it past the first reboot.  During the install, I had to use text
> mode as
> the graphical mode install would not work.  After the first reboot I
> get a
> series of segmentation faults.  For example, one of the lines is
> 
> /etc/X11/prefdm: line 47: 323 Segmentation fault which gdm >/dev/null
> 2>&1
> 
> I've booted from the DVD and went into rescue mode and changed the
> xorg.conf
> file to use 24 or 32 bit mode without any success.  I also set the init
> level
> to 3 and it boots into text mode OK.  However, when I type a command
> like "more
> xorg.conf" I get a segmentation fault but if I type the command again
> there is
> no fault.
> 
> Any suggestions or has anyone gotten Core 2 to install on Virtual PC?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> 
> 	
> 		
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Domains ? Claim yours for only $14.70/year
> http://smallbusiness.promotions.yahoo.com/offer 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 11
> Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 11:15:44 -0400
> From: Phil Schaffner <Philip R Schaffner NASA gov>
> Subject: Re: stable Fedora releases?
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list redhat com>
> Message-ID: <1085152544 12240 164 camel radar0 larc nasa gov>
> Content-Type: text/plain
> 
> On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 10:27, Paul Chauvet wrote:
> > Honestly, if you are looking for something as a successor in the
> > Academic Environment that is rock solid, look at RH Enterprise Linux
> > again.  Their academic pricing (without support, but with updates)
> are
> > incredibly cheap ($50 for servers $25 for workstations).
> > 
> > We have a couple of labs and a dozen servers (some of the servers
> with
> > support contracts though which brings the price way up though but it
> is
> > worth it).  I and some other computer staff/students still use
> Fedora
> > Core (1 and now 2) on their desktops.  We also use Fedora Core on
> some
> > of our less critical servers.  If you need the rock solid stability,
> > then that is what Red Hat Enterprise is really meant to be for, and
> for
> > an academic price, it is very affordable.
> 
> For those reading this thread who may not qualify for academic
> pricing,
> and want more stability than Fedora will offer, consider looking at
> some
> of the RHEL rebuilds:
> 
> http://whiteboxlinux.org/
> http://www.taolinux.org/
> http://www.centos.org/
> 
> Phil
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 12
> Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 17:13:51 +0200
> From: Jiri Kanak <Jiri Kanak Sun COM>
> Subject: Installation problem
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list redhat com>
> Message-ID: <40AE1CAF 7040305 sun com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> finaly i have decided to fresh install FC2.
> During first boot after installation a have configured NIS and edited 
> /etc/auto.master to use yp:auto_home for /home dir.
> 
> After next reboot, i can't see any file in /usr.
> 
> Wondering why, i have done another fresh installation, which lead into
> 
> the same result.
> 
> Any idea?
> 
> 
> Jiri
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 13
> Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 16:17:00 +0100
> From: Rui Miguel Seabra <rms 1407 org>
> Subject: Re: nvidia and FC2
> To: fedora-list redhat com
> Message-ID: <1085152620 2801 51 camel roque>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> On Thu, 2004-05-20 at 11:44 -0400, jerry wrote:
> > it used to be that you couldn't do anything, but some improvement,
> FAR 
> > FROM WHAT IT SHOULD BE.  btw, the two RMSs duking it out on the issue
> a 
> > while back, were those really stallman in disguise? ;-)
> 
> If you mean me, no.
> 
> But I learned to value Free Software.. before... I didn't care either.
> 
> Rui
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 189 bytes
> Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
> Url :
> /archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040521/639966de/attachment.bin
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 14
> Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 11:17:57 -0400 (EDT)
> From: howarth bromo msbb uc edu (Jack Howarth)
> Subject: Re: stable Fedora releases?
> To: fedora-list redhat com
> Message-ID: <20040521151757 12F731DC0EB bromo msbb uc edu>
> 
> Doug,
>    Well my concern would be the speed and depth of the security
> updates
> from www.fedoralegacy.org. As I mentioned in another message, one of
> my main concerns was the forking of these RedHat releases with the
> Fedora/Enterprise split. The need go to yet another party for 
> security updates for Fedora introduces yet another fork in the
> process.
> I would use Debian but I am afraid they won't have the same ease of
> use for configuring such things a software RAID 1 mirrors during
> installation.
>                        Jack
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 15
> Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 10:58:16 -0400
> From: Will Backman <whb ceimaine org>
> Subject: Re: stable Fedora releases?
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list redhat com>
> Message-ID: <1085151496 1922 21 camel d1ntpm41>
> Content-Type: text/plain
> 
> On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 10:46, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
> > Jack Howarth wrote:
> > 
> > >    Okay, up front I realize that Fedora is a hobbyist release...
> > >but the same could be said of Debian. With that said, is there 
> > >any plan in place for eventually having a benchmark stable Fedora
> > >release which would be equivalent to the Stable branch of Debian?
> > >I ask because it is unclear if one will be able to install a Core
> > >release and get access to the proper security patches without
> > >constantly upgrading Fedora to the point of it reverting back to
> > >a Test release (for the next Core of course). I know in the
> > >academic environment many folks are looking at Fedora as a
> successor
> > >to RedHat 9 but I am afraid it is more likely to be a Debian
> > >Unstable type release at best.
> > >                   Jack
> > >
> > Well rh9, 8 , etc.. are also hobbyist releases, which is funny that I
> 
> > have installed those in my company for essential servers that must be
> 
> > stable. But I guess my company isn't up to par with the big companies
> 
> > that need the REAL Redhat for their servers. FUD in reverse? Or
> better 
> > yet, the FUD cycle?
> > 
> > Oh was this what you asked?
> > 
> > Anyway, it would probably be better to use Debian right now.
> 
> Stable has a couple of meanings.
> There is stable, as in "doesn't crash" and stable as in "things don't
> change".
> I think the goal of Fedora is to test new stuff, so things should be
> unstable in the second sense.
> RedHat had a policy where minor number changes had binary
> compatibility,
> and major number changes broke stuff.  I don't think Fedora tries to
> provide continuity between releases.  Anaconda does its best.  For
> most
> of us, this is ok.  We back up our home directories, and reinstall. 
> For
> servers with a long life, you want the "if it ain't broke don't fix
> it"
> design, which you can get with their enterprise products.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 16
> Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 11:20:43 -0400
> From: Phil Schaffner <Philip R Schaffner NASA gov>
> Subject: Re: Fedora Core2 -> Enterprise
> To: Dave Gavin <dgavin davegavin com>,	For users of Fedora Core
> 	releases <fedora-list redhat com>
> Message-ID: <1085152842 12240 169 camel radar0 larc nasa gov>
> Content-Type: text/plain
> 
> On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 10:42, David Gavin wrote:
> >   I had to change an RH 8.0 system to RHEL3 recently and ended up
> having
> > to do a new install as here was no upgrade option offered during the
> > install.
> 
> What you wanted was the "upgradeany" option.  The link is for
> WhiteBox,
> but the same technique has been reported to work for RHEL:
> 
>   http://beau.org/pipermail/whitebox-users/2004-March/000898.html
> 
> Phil
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 17
> Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 10:09:38 -0400
> From: "Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak" <mjc avtechpulse com>
> Subject: startup programs?
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list redhat com>
> Message-ID: <40AE0DA2 9040007 avtechpulse com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
> 
> Hi,
> 
> FC1 has a Preferences > More Preferences > Sessions menu where startup
> 
> programs can be added (to automatically start programs after login),
> and 
> the "prompt before logout" can be disabled.
> 
> This seems to have vanished in FC2. Where can I find it?
> 
> 
> - Mike
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 18
> Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 10:22:16 -0500
> From: "-=Brian Truter=-" <brian famvid com>
> Subject: RE: i2o - howto install?
> To: "'For users of Fedora Core releases'" <fedora-list redhat com>
> Message-ID: <E1BRBoz-0007Xh-MX smtp02 glenview famvid com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"
> 
> > > Thank you Warren!
> > > 
> > > This procedure worked perfectly. A few warnings are displayed on 
> > > screen, but they seem to have been non-critical. The system 
> > rebooted 
> > > perfectly. Thanks for your help.
> > > 
> > > I installed the raidutils from http://i2o.shadowconnect.com 
> > but there 
> > > seems to be an issue with that.
> > > I loaded the i2o_config module, then tested the raidutils with the
> 
> > > command "raidutil -L logical". Here is the info:
> > > 
> > > [root fc2test root]# raidutil -L logical Engine connect failed: 
> > > COMPATIBILITY number [root fc2test root]# lsmod | grep i2o
> > > i2o_config              9616  0
> > > i2o_proc               40476  0
> > > i2o_block              13600  7
> > > i2o_core               39280  3 i2o_config,i2o_proc,i2o_block
> > > [root fc2test root]# l /dev/i2o/ctl
> > > crw-------  1 root root 10, 166 Feb 23 15:02 /dev/i2o/ctl 
> > > [root fc2test root]# rpm -q raidutils
> > > raidutils-0.0.4-1
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > http://people.redhat.com/arjanv/2.6/RPMS.kernel/
> > Please try the latest test kernel from here first.  It has a 
> > few more i2o related fixes.  Please report back.
> > 
> > Warren Togami
> > wtogami redhat com
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > fedora-list mailing list
> > fedora-list redhat com
> > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> > 
> 
> 
> Sorry it took me so long to reply, Warren. I got a chance to install
> the new
> kernel this morning. Here is the results:
> 
> [root fc2test root]# uname -a
> Linux brian 2.6.6-1.374 #1 Wed May 19 12:44:14 EDT 2004 i686 i686 i386
> GNU/Linux
> [root fc2test root]# lsmod | grep i2o
> i2o_proc               50972  0
> i2o_config             11280  0
> i2o_block              16160  7
> i2o_core               41968  3 i2o_proc,i2o_config,i2o_block
> [root fc2test root]# raidutil -L logical
> osdIOrequest : File /dev/dpti17 Could Not Be Opened
> Engine connect failed: COMPATIBILITY number
> 
> 
> I think /dev/dpti17 is the character device for the dpt_i2o driver,
> isn't
> it?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 19
> Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 11:23:42 -0400
> From: Luc Bouchard <luc luker on ca>
> Subject: Re: nvidia and FC2
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list redhat com>
> Message-ID: <1085153022 3763 2 camel sven internal ca>
> Content-Type: text/plain
> 
> On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 04:57, Rui Miguel Seabra wrote:
> > Software patents are a nightmare, and they must be taken down.
> > There are only two ways to do it:
> >   prevent them from existing (what we're trying to do in Europe)
> 
> 
> Hate to burst your bubble, however quite the opposite is happening in
> Europe as shown by posts in this very forum.
> 
> Luc Bouchard
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 20
> Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 11:24:18 -0400
> From: "Michael" <mike mrktechweb com>
> Subject: Multiple speed problems
> To: "Fedora Users" <fedora-list redhat com>
> Message-ID: <200405211526 i4LFQwu02032 dns1 mrktechweb com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"
> 
> I am having a problem with FC2 that just started yesterday evening. 
> All was
> fine the day before yesterday and when I started my system yesterday,
> everything was moving at an extremely slow speed.  At startup, as the
> machine is going through loading all of the DSO's, each one of them
> takes an
> extremely long time (30-40 seconds) to load and there are a couple
> like
> sendmail and vsftpd that take 5-10 minutes to load.  Once everything
> is
> loaded and I log in to the box, anything that I try to start, from
> file
> managers to consoles to text editors takes several minutes to load.  I
> also
> tried using yum since this all started to update a couple packages and
> I am
> receiving a msg that says [errno 4] I/Oerror: <url open error >.  Also
> there
> are 2 errors that show up consistently in the syslog since this started
> and
> they are; 
> 
> kernel: cdrom: open failed; and 
> mdmpd: mdmpd failed; 
> 
> - there is also another error that showed in the syslog prior to this
> problem and continues to show since the problem started which says 
> kernel: there is already a security framework initialized,
> register_security
> failed
> Kernel: Failure registering capabilities with the kernel
> 
> I have no idea what is causing these problems.  Any help anyone can
> give
> would be greatly appreciated.
> 
> Mike
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list redhat com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> 
> 
> End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 3, Issue 324
> *******************************************



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]