[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: BIND issues with rndc

Am Mo, den 24.05.2004 schrieb James Marcinek um 21:40:

> The cross post came after I didn't get any feedback from the BIND mailling
> list. I upgraded from 8 to 9 (along with the Red Hat distros) and I did no
> special chroot for this.
> James

Well, what do you expect? You post at about Mon, 24 May 2004 14:55:26
-0400 (EDT) on the bind list and at 15:08:55 here and the other 2 RH

And with RH9 you are wrong here, as well on the Taroon list. RH9 had no
bind chroot. Your named.conf/named.custom must be invalid.


Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 1 (Yarrow) on Athlon CPU kernel 2.4.22-1.2188.nptl
Sirendipity 22:30:07 up 2 days, 4:26, load average: 1.35, 1.48, 1.41 
                   [ ÎÎÏÎÎ Ï'ÎÏÏÎÎ - gnothi seauton ]
             my life is a planetarium - and you are the stars

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]