Nautilis Continually Crashing @ Boot

[Mark Sargent]

Hi All,

is memtest86 included in the install by chance..? smartctl -l error/dev/hda
from the cli, yes..? Cheers.

P.S. Someone mentioned perhaps a faulty configuration, and deleting all
gnome files in the home/<user> folder...good idea..?

Mark Sargent.

-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-list-bounces at redhat.com
[mailto:fedora-list-bounces at redhat.com]On Behalf Of James Wilkinson
Sent: 2004?11?11? 9:31
To: For users of Fedora Core releases
Subject: Re: Nautilis Continually Crashing @ Boot


Mark Sargent wrote:
> my sharemate suggests that if the 2 installs, RH9 and Fedora Core 2 were
on
> the same drive/partitions(which they were), it could be a bad sector
> problem..? Does this sound feasable to anyone here..? Cheers.

It's possible, but unlikely.

I seem to be missing a couple of messages in the exchange, but it sounds
as though the FC2 install was a fresh install, with newly formatted
filesystems. In that case, any troublesome blocks should have been
mapped out by the disk hardware when FC2 was installed, and something
new was written over the failing blocks (and if nothing's been written
to a block, then Linux won't care what's in it).

That's unless the disk is out of spare sectors. Use
smartctl -l error /dev/hda
to see if the drive is reporting errors. If it is, don't trust it.

But it sounds much more likely that you've got a dodgy memory subsystem.
Use memtest86 to check.

Hope this helps,

James.

--
E-mail address: james | "In these troubled times, it's always refreshing to
@westexe.demon.co.uk  | see a major company concentrating on vital issues.
                      | It would be even more refreshing if Compaq tried it
                      | for once."  -- The Inquirer

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list at redhat.com
To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list