Yum repo compatibility

Erik Kjær Pedersen erik at binghamton.edu
Fri Nov 5 01:02:56 UTC 2004


Torsdag 04 november 2004 19:40 skrev Dag Wieers:
> Let me add to this that the incompatability of the 3rd party repositories
> has nothing to do with the inability or unwillingness of the 3rd party
> packagers (to the contrary). But the unwillingness (and policy) of
> fedora.us to not allow for compatibility. Apparently it is too hard to
> work with the community.
>
> Kind regards,
> --   dag wieers,  dag at wieers.com,  http://dag.wieers.com/   --

That is really interesting. I use 

rpm http://apt.sw.be fedora/2/en/i386 dag
from your repository
rpm http://ayo.freshrpms.net fedora/linux/2/i386 core updates freshrpms
from freshrpms
and 

rpm ftp://apt.us.kde-redhat.org/linux/kde-redhat/apt/ fedora/2        stable
rpm ftp://apt.us.kde-redhat.org/linux/kde-redhat/apt/ fedora/all      stable
rpm ftp://apt.us.kde-redhat.org/linux/kde-redhat/apt/ kde-redhat/2    stable
rpm ftp://apt.us.kde-redhat.org/linux/kde-redhat/apt/ kde-redhat/all  stable

from kde-redhat. Unitl recently I had no problems, but the last couple of days 
a little bit. I have normally gotten mplayer from freshrpms, but recently 
there was an upgrade from your repository. Is that problem free

Erik




More information about the fedora-list mailing list