Integration of SpamAssassin with Evolution 1.4

[Michael Peters]

On Sunday, November 21, 2004, at 11:49PM, A. Lanza <alf at lanza-ti.com> wrote:

>but it's not because of processing time taken by SpamAssassin,
>processor usage stays low. Anybody have an idea of what could be
>happening?

Spa,Assassin is slow.
It doesn't max out your cpu, but it also doesn't do things in parallel which would max out your cpu - but get the job done a lot faster.

I like it, I use it, but it is slow.

Filter for spam after you filter everything else, and tell your other filters to stop processessing once they filter a message. That helps some.