kernel-2.6.9-1.6_FC2 boot failure where kernel-2.6.9-1.3_FC2 works
Ricardo Veguilla
veguilla at hpcf.upr.edu
Wed Nov 24 21:28:49 UTC 2004
Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote:
> Matthew Miller wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 12:05:24PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
>>
> [more snipping]
>
>> Using "root=/dev/hda2" works around the problem. Odd.
>
>
> I've always hated that label thing. It is a bandaid that attempts to
> solve one solvable problem (changing disk device names) by creating
> another unsolvable problem (non-uniq labels).
>
> If you ever change your hardware configuration (how often does that
> happen? once every couple of years?
Let me see, everytime a new a new Fedora, Suse, Slackware ( and now
Ubuntu too) is released.
> plus hd* names do not change when you add/remove disks)
Really? and when you add/remove partitions?
> you can always easily edit lilo.conf and fstab by booting into rescue
> mode.
So its much easier to boot in rescue mode to fix lilo.conf and fstab
than to boot into rescue mode to fix the label?
> That will also save you huge amount of grief if you ever connect
> additional disk to your box that already contains file system with
> "LABEL=/"
Now I must ask, how often does that happen?
> or /var or /usr (disk from another box, that you want to reuse, or
> simply repair something on it and return it to original box).
> Statistics say that in such case you should have 50% chance of
> mounting the right partitions during boot. However, in my experience,
> in 99% of such cases, Linux mounts wrong partitions if you use labels
> in fstab.
>
> This doesn't solve the original problems of labels not working. But
> IMHO, labels were bad idea to begin with, so I can't say I feel sorry
> for seeing them not working ;-)
The only problem I have encountered with using labels is a LVM2 related
bug. Apart from that, they work perfectly in my experience.
Regards,
Ricardo Veguilla
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list