Why no /proc/config.gz on FC-3 kernel?

[Dave Jones]

On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 01:07:58AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:

 > >  ls /boot/config-`uname -r`
 > 
 > I guess the argument is: there's a chance that something got skipped and the
 > a kernel got built with the name matching a /boot/config-* file but actually
 > with different options -- no risk of that with the /proc approach.
 
There's no risk of it happening with the current approach either.
The .config that gets packaged is the .config rpmbuild faced
when it built the RPM. Why would it be different ?

		Dave