RPMS.at-good and RPMS.at-stable

[Robert P. J. Day]

On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Axel Thimm wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 11:11:49AM +0100, eric tanguy wrote:
> > > eric tanguy wrote:
> > >> What's the difference between these 2 repo ?
> > >
> > > Sorry, misread the question last time.
> > >
> > > The difference is explained at the bottom of http://atrpms.net/
> > >
> > > Paul.
> > So if i understand well all packages from at-stable are included in
> > at-good (maybe with newer version) ?
>
> Yes, less stable repos contain all of their more stable counterparts:
>
> good contains stable
> testing contains good and stable
> bleeding contains testing, good and stable

so this means you can't have more than one version of the same piece
of software?  a stable version, *and* a bleeding edge version?  or am
i misreading that?

rday