FC 2 is SLOOOOOW!!
Thomas E. Dukes
edukes at alltel.net
Sun Oct 3 19:52:33 UTC 2004
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fedora-list-bounces at redhat.com
> [mailto:fedora-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Filippos
> Klironomos
> Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2004 3:47 PM
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> Subject: Re: FC 2 is SLOOOOOW!!
>
> >
> > I do not believe this is a mondo problem. Is anyone else
> seeing this
> > on FC 2?
> >
>
>
> I just did my full system backup two days ago. I haven't used 'mondo'
> I just go the traditional 'tar-ball' way (I split everything
> on one tar-ball and then '/usr' dir and subdirs on a second
> one) and then burn the two compressed tar-balls on a DVD.
>
> The process took longer due to more files compared with
> previous RH9 installation. I would say there was
> approximatelly 100Mb more under /usr/ this time. Other than
> that I run the root shell on an xterm instead of a
> gnome-terminal that are infinitely slower under FC2. The
> xterm has light speed faster output.
>
> So to answer you question, I don't know how 'mondo' works put
> if it outputs on the terminal and you run it under a
> gnome-terminal this will be really really really slow. Try
> running it on an xterm for better speed results.
Hi,
I'm running it from the console. I don't use the gui.
Would a 100MB or so make a 6 hour difference?
Thanks
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list