Digitally signed emails

[Colin Charles]

On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 12:02, Brian Fahrlander wrote:

> > > Do we need digitally signed emails for this list?
> > 
> > No, we don't need digitally signed e-mails on the lists, but most are
> > posting with Evolution, and there are no "hooks" like there are in mutt
> > for instance, where you can say "disable signing when mailing X, Y, and
> > Z list"
> 
>     Actually, yeah, it does.  But this is the only place that has any
> preference for it, so it tends to get forgotten. Just so ya know.

As in "yeah, Evolution does support hooks" or "yeah, we need digitally
signed emails" ?

> > So, we tolerate it. Re it crashing Outlook, its a case of that's just
> > too bad, and hope you have better luck with another e-mail client (if
> > you have to use Windows, there's Thunderbird, Mozilla, Pegasus and
> > probably many more)
> 
>     Yeah, there must be a dozen good ones, and another dozen behind that
> that are getting better.  Does Evolution have a Win32 version?

No (re: Win32 version)

This thread should die now, as others can search the archives
</list-admin-hat>
-- 
Colin Charles, byte at aeon.com.my
http://www.bytebot.net/
"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, 
then you win." -- Mohandas Gandhi