OT: DSL Vs. Cable

Nathan fedora at montana.com
Mon Oct 11 23:31:15 UTC 2004


On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 17:12, Phillip T. George wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> Made a new topic, because there's so many replies to the other post, I
> didn't know which one to reply to.  It seems to me that in Tulsa, OK the
> choice to go with is Cox cable.  Its possible that the phone lines just
> aren't up to par or there's some other reason as to why DSL is not very
> good.
> If anyone in the Texas area uses cable instead of DSL, please reply and
> let us know how your service has been (especially if you have used DSL
> before).  I'd like to see the comparison of someone who has firsthand
> experience at both.  Like I said, in my area (Tulsa, OK), Cox cable seems
> to be a much better choice.  Most of our customers don't even know where
> the Cable modem is, where as with our customers that have DSL (cheaper, of
> course) know EXACTLY where their DSL modem is at :)
> 
> -Phillip

You might try dslreports: http://www.dslreports.com/psearch to find out
what ISPs have positive and negative feedback in your area.

Nathan Kaderavek




More information about the fedora-list mailing list