More SSH 'trolling'

Thu Oct 14 19:31:26 UTC 2004

Am Do, den 14.10.2004 schrieb Alexander Dalloz um 21:25:

> I must say that I do not understand that argument. It would be same as
> saying: SSH is useless, because it's enryption of the transfered
> information induces a sense of security, while it does not protect
> against the usage of secure passwords. If you misinterpret portknocking

It should of course read "does not protect against the usage of insecure
passwords"

Alexander

-- 
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) kernel 2.6.8-1.521smp 
Serendipity 21:30:27 up 16:41, 16 users, 0.16, 0.22, 0.23 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20041014/3a8f9a11/attachment-0001.sig>