FLAME____ Why is the kernel source not included

[Shaffer, Paul D]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: fedora-list-bounces at redhat.com
[mailto:fedora-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of ne...
>Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 11:56 AM
>To: For users of Fedora Core releases
>Subject: Re: Burning the ISOs for Fedora Core 2
>
>
>On Oct 15, 2004 at 12:22, Kris Guye in a soothing rage wrote:
>
>>
>>Hello,
>>
>>When burning the Fedora Core 2 ISO images using Nero, I get the 
>>following
>>message:
>[SNIP]
>
>Sorry, you are in the wrong thread. This thread is about flaming. The
real subject is 'FLAME____ Why is
>the kernel source'. What you want to do is start a new thread by c-n-p
the list address into a new mail
>compose window and send that instead.
>
>[we now return to our regularly scheduled flame]

Yeah, right.  I was considering unsubscribing this list until today -
what excitement!  The controversy - Ohh the humanity....

>-----Original Message-----
>From: fedora-list-bounces at redhat.com
[mailto:fedora-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Ken Johanson
>Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 11:52 AM
>To: For users of Fedora Core releases
>Subject: Re: FLAME____ Why is the kernel source not included
>
>
>Take it or leave it, criticize em or defend em. It all depends on how 
>each person uses the kernel.
>
>Take care.
>Ken

No kiddin!? :-)  Ever heard the old saying "you can please some of the
people all the time..."  I guess you are "all of the people, some of the
time."  Few (not including myself) are fully aware of the probably
several dozen reasons factoring into this decision.  "Shipping" equals
bandwidth for Redhat and the mirrors.  Take it, leave it, whatever -
deal with it.  Good luck changing a decision that has already been made,
justified and pretty much history now.