FLAME____ Why is the kernel source not included

Matthew Miller mattdm at mattdm.org
Fri Oct 15 20:49:09 UTC 2004


On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 02:45:02PM -0600, Ken Johanson wrote:
> I meant to say that its desirable to get the incremental updates using 
> any lightweight (or not) methods, say CVS, without downloading a whole 
> new rpm (source tree) for each update - or even becoming dependent on rpm...

This is a branch into a different argument -- if you don't want to use RPM,
why do you want a binary RPM of the kernel source?

But really, I think you _do_ want to use RPM, and just don't know it yet. :)



-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdm at mattdm.org        <http://www.mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>                <http://linux.bu.edu/>




More information about the fedora-list mailing list