FLAME____ Why is the kernel source not included
Matthew Miller
mattdm at mattdm.org
Fri Oct 15 20:49:09 UTC 2004
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 02:45:02PM -0600, Ken Johanson wrote:
> I meant to say that its desirable to get the incremental updates using
> any lightweight (or not) methods, say CVS, without downloading a whole
> new rpm (source tree) for each update - or even becoming dependent on rpm...
This is a branch into a different argument -- if you don't want to use RPM,
why do you want a binary RPM of the kernel source?
But really, I think you _do_ want to use RPM, and just don't know it yet. :)
--
Matthew Miller mattdm at mattdm.org <http://www.mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list