Can I sell fedora?
Lew Bloch
conrad at lewscanon.com
Mon Oct 25 02:21:58 UTC 2004
Erik Hemdal opined:
> One can't sell GPL software
> for whatever one wants, one can only recover the cost of distributing
> media, etc. You can argue that it costs $100 to burn a CD in your
> country (maybe your ISP charges by the mile and electricity is very
> expensive) but it seems dubious from here. Your (the OP) own messages
> indicate that you know a $100 price is inflated.
I tell you unequivocally that the GPL permits you to sell at any price.
Sell a single-floppy distribution of Linux for $10,000.00 U.S., as
long as you provide the source code for free. Heck, charge a million
dollars U.S. The GPL imposes absolutely no ceiling on the price you can
charge.
The license states:
- "You may charge a fee for the physical act of transferring a copy, and
you may at your option offer warranty protection in exchange for a fee."
Notice that it talks of charging for the act of copying, not for the
media or the copy itself.
- "You must cause any work that you distribute or publish, that in whole
or in part contains or is derived from the Program or any part thereof,
to be licensed as a whole at no charge to all third parties under the
terms of this License."
This only requires that the license be provided at no charge, not the
software.
- "Accompany it with a written offer, valid for at least three years, to
give any third party, for a charge no more than your cost of physically
performing source distribution, a complete machine-readable copy of the
corresponding source code, to be distributed under the terms of Sections
1 and 2 above on a medium customarily used for software interchange" (if
you do not include the source code with the product).
It does not say that you have to distribute the binaries for "no more
than .. cost". Only the source is covered by this part of the
agreement, as I read it.
It does not specify how to determine cost; I imagine that the cost of
doing business with the government is legitimately includable. Don't
forget to factor in the intangible costs, such as the risk of legal
action against you. Even one such incident could run very expensive;
amortize its expected value into your overhead.
How much is your time and effort worth for the "physical act of
transferring a copy"? That's time you will never get back. Would you
pay a million dollars to live an extra hour?
It also makes it clear that the license does not generally mean "'free'
as in 'free beer' but 'free' as in 'free speech'".
I am not a lawyer nor an accountant, not even in my own country. Unless
they are in one of those professions in your country, other people's
opinions might be interesting, but I'll bet you're better off reading
the GPL for yourself, seeking competent professional advice from someone
knowledgeable about your prevailing conditions, and ignoring anything we
tell you (unless, as stated, the person actually is qualified).
You have no reason to believe that I understand the GPL any more
authoritatively than any reasonably well-informed and intelligent person.
Charge the most you can get someone to pay. Even if you tell your
customers or your law enforcement authorities, "Lew said it was OK", I
will still not be culpable for the results you get from doing so.
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list