Linux vs Windows security report.

[Robin Laing]

PFJ wrote:
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Date:
> Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:55:51 -0600
> 
> MIME-Version:
> 1.0
> X-Mailer:
> Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
> Content-Type:
> multipart/mixed; boundary="----_=_NextPart_002_01C4BAAB.19E79D80"
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 
>>We have all heard the hype that Windows is more secure that Linux.
>>
>>Here is a report and analysis of the data that Microsoft mudged and/or 
>>ignored to their benefit.
> 
> 
> You may be interested in a little project of mine on this matter. Have a
> look at
> 
> http://www.refute-the-facts.org.uk
> 
> The CSS is a bit screwed at 800x600, but I'll be fixing that tonight.
> 
> TTFN
> 
> Paul

I never believed the Microsoft "facts" as they are known to use their 
marketting teams to write the copy in the long run.  They are afraid 
and are doing the best they can to make linux look bad.  I find that 
each time the truth comes out, it makes them look worse.  Keep it up 
Microsoft.

-- 
Robin Laing