[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Digitally signed emails



On Sun, 2004-10-10 at 19:26, Colin Charles wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 00:32, Thomas E. Dukes wrote:
> 
> > Do we need digitally signed emails for this list?
> 
> No, we don't need digitally signed e-mails on the lists, but most are
> posting with Evolution, and there are no "hooks" like there are in mutt
> for instance, where you can say "disable signing when mailing X, Y, and
> Z list"

    Actually, yeah, it does.  But this is the only place that has any
preference for it, so it tends to get forgotten. Just so ya know.

> So, we tolerate it. Re it crashing Outlook, its a case of that's just
> too bad, and hope you have better luck with another e-mail client (if
> you have to use Windows, there's Thunderbird, Mozilla, Pegasus and
> probably many more)

    Yeah, there must be a dozen good ones, and another dozen behind that
that are getting better.  Does Evolution have a Win32 version?

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brian FahrlÃnder                  Christian, Conservative, and Technomad
Evansville, IN                                 http://www.fahrlander.net
ICQ 5119262
AIM: WheelDweller
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]