[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Digitally signed emails

On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 12:02, Brian Fahrlander wrote:

> > > Do we need digitally signed emails for this list?
> > 
> > No, we don't need digitally signed e-mails on the lists, but most are
> > posting with Evolution, and there are no "hooks" like there are in mutt
> > for instance, where you can say "disable signing when mailing X, Y, and
> > Z list"
>     Actually, yeah, it does.  But this is the only place that has any
> preference for it, so it tends to get forgotten. Just so ya know.

As in "yeah, Evolution does support hooks" or "yeah, we need digitally
signed emails" ?

> > So, we tolerate it. Re it crashing Outlook, its a case of that's just
> > too bad, and hope you have better luck with another e-mail client (if
> > you have to use Windows, there's Thunderbird, Mozilla, Pegasus and
> > probably many more)
>     Yeah, there must be a dozen good ones, and another dozen behind that
> that are getting better.  Does Evolution have a Win32 version?

No (re: Win32 version)

This thread should die now, as others can search the archives
Colin Charles, byte aeon com my
"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, 
then you win." -- Mohandas Gandhi

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]