[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: FLAME____ Why is the kernel source not included

On Fri, 2004-10-15 at 11:45, Ken Johanson wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > Alexander said "Mount FC2 CD3"
> Yes he did, and ended his comment in an inflammatory tone - without 
> investigating or being aware-of the FC3 release candidate, and the 
> reported plans to exclude the source from the install discs. He set 
> himself up for that response by using the word 'investigating' and being 
> rude.

How can you possibly imply what Alexander is/is not aware of. Unless, of
course, you are a mind reader.

Being rude is what you have been good at with this thread.  Including
calling one of the most helpful persons on this list a moron.

This list is for the released versions of Fedora, but from his posts I
believe he is very aware of the changes and upcoming release although it
is not yet ripe for inclusion in discussion here.

And it is documented that the kernel sources for FC3 will be on the
source disks and not in the binary distro.

That does not change the fact that they are included in the distro.
> > 
> > You mounted "FC3 CD3" (presumably one of the test releases since FC3 
> > does not yet exist)
> > 
> > For the FC3 source (which is off-topic for this list btw), you'd need 
> > the SRPM:
> > http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/test/2.92/SRPMS/kernel-2.6.8-1.541.src.rpm
> > 
> > 
> > Paul.
> > 
> Sorry Paul - let me do looking and and find the test-specific mailing 
> list. Sorry if I burdened anyone here for pointing out an arguable 
> deficiency in a release due out in 2 weeks.
> And hopefully anyone who has an problem while wanting to build custom 
> kernels or module will catch this issue when they browse through the 
> test 'list' and find my post about this, there... And most people wont 
> need to build NIC modules, or build in SCSI or NTFS drivers, so should 
> be able to get the source onto their machine form the site...
> Do you sense a tad bit of sarcasm? I take the kernel very seriously - 
> like I said, it *is* our constitution. Constitutions are lost if we dont 
> fight to keep them intact.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]