Networks,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Alexander Dalloz
alexander.dalloz at uni-bielefeld.de
Mon Oct 18 00:17:05 UTC 2004
- Previous message (by thread): Networks,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
- Next message (by thread): Networks,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
Am Mo, den 18.10.2004 schrieb James Wilkinson um 2:06:
> Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> > Yes, telnet (server) is a DON'T under all circumstances.
> That *is* debatable: if you've got a secure network, then it's
> reasonable. For example, if you've got the server, the client, and all
> cabling in the same room (and visible), and the users are trusted, it's
> OK. Or if you're doing telnet over a VPN.
>
> James.
Ok, in such a very special case I would agree. But is telnet more
comfortable than using ssh? Or why would one prefer using telnet? And if
you use telnet in some situation I am sure you use it in others as well,
where you better don't ;)
Alexander
--
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) kernel 2.6.8-1.521smp
Serendipity 02:11:42 up 3 days, 21:23, load average: 0.24, 0.24, 0.32
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20041018/dffb6821/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): Networks,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
- Next message (by thread): Networks,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list