Networks,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Alexander Dalloz alexander.dalloz at uni-bielefeld.de
Mon Oct 18 00:17:05 UTC 2004


Am Mo, den 18.10.2004 schrieb James Wilkinson um 2:06:

> Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> > Yes, telnet (server) is a DON'T under all circumstances.

> That *is* debatable: if you've got a secure network, then it's
> reasonable. For example, if you've got the server, the client, and all
> cabling in the same room (and visible), and the users are trusted, it's
> OK. Or if you're doing telnet over a VPN.
> 
> James.

Ok, in such a very special case I would agree. But is telnet more
comfortable than using ssh? Or why would one prefer using telnet? And if
you use telnet in some situation I am sure you use it in others as well,
where you better don't ;)

Alexander


-- 
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) kernel 2.6.8-1.521smp 
Serendipity 02:11:42 up 3 days, 21:23, load average: 0.24, 0.24, 0.32 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20041018/dffb6821/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the fedora-list mailing list