to newcomers: please try to solve the problem yourself before asking
Robert P. J. Day
rpjday at mindspring.com
Sun Sep 12 10:02:36 UTC 2004
On Sat, 11 Sep 2004, Bob Holtzman wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Sep 2004, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
>> p.s. i might also point out that, for someone who presumes to lecture
>> others on mailing list etiquette, raymond has an annoying habit of
>> appending overly-verbose sigs to some of his posts, reminding everyone
>> of his fondness for firearms, as you can see here:
>>
>> http://lwn.net/2002/0221/a/the-beginning.php3
>
> Your objection to ESR's sig is length or content?
since i feel like waxing philosophical at the moment, let me reproduce
the sig in question so people know what i'm talking about:
================
If gun laws in fact worked, the sponsors of this type of legislation
should have no difficulty drawing upon long lists of examples of
criminal acts reduced by such legislation. That they cannot do so
after a century and a half of trying -- that they must sweep under the
rug the southern attempts at gun control in the 1870-1910 period, the
northeastern attempts in the 1920-1939 period, the attempts at both
Federal and State levels in 1965-1976 -- establishes the repeated,
complete and inevitable failure of gun laws to control serious crime.
-- Senator Orrin Hatch, in a 1982 Senate Report
================
first, by the standard rules of sig, it's too long -- the normal
rule is 4 lines, no more. that's generally enough to say what you
want to say, and give out whatever personal or professional info you
want to share.
as to content, in my personal opinion, a sig like that turns a
technical posting into spam, plain and simple. think about it.
let's say you received an email with nothing *but* that sig as
content. clearly, the sender wanted to share his views on gun control
and, just as clearly, the message would be spam. *no* *one* would
disagree with that, and you would be justified in being annoyed at
having received it.
so how does attaching it to a technical mailing list posting
suddenly make it acceptable? at that point, it simply becomes spam
with some techie stuff attached to justify it, and it's just as much
spam as before.
rday
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list