Implementing SPAM and virus protection for mail server
Patrick McSwiggen
Pat.McSwiggen at uc.edu
Mon Sep 20 18:26:07 UTC 2004
On Sep 20, 2004, at 11:30 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> OT as is this, but IMO, the knickers in a knot that hormel seems to
> have gotten themselves into, does rather sound like something they
> really should get over. They'll never be able to control the real
> world useage of so common a word, one thats been part of the US
> english vocabulary for something over 60 years IIRC.
Well, this is really off-topic, but the law is that if a company
doesn't seek to protect their trademark, then they lose it all
together. So Hormel might or might not care one wit about the use of
spam to describe unsolicited bulk email, but if they didn't make an
*attempt* to protect their trademark (as they are doing--possibly
knowing full well that it's hopeless), they would lose the trademark in
the food area and other companies could come in and market their own
SPAM. (God help us!)
--
Patrick D. McSwiggen pat.mcswiggen at math.uc.edu
Department of Mathematics Office: +1 513 556-4080
University of Cincinnati FAX: +1 513 556-3417
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list