fedora-list Digest, Vol 6, Issue 371
usmany at excite.com
usmany at excite.com
Wed Sep 1 19:32:33 UTC 2004
--- On Tue 08/31, < fedora-list-request at redhat.com > wrote:
From: [mailto: fedora-list-request at redhat.com]
To: fedora-list at redhat.com
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 18:09:04 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: fedora-list Digest, Vol 6, Issue 371
Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to<br> fedora-list at redhat.com<br><br>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list<br>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br> fedora-list-request at redhat.com<br><br>You can reach the person managing the list at<br> fedora-list-owner at redhat.com<br><br>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..."<br><br><br>Today's Topics:<br><br> 1. Re: Loki games (Pasha)<br> 2. Re: kopete and Yahoo! (Mike Ramirez)<br> 3. Re: Loki games (Mike Ramirez)<br> 4. RE: fedora-list Digest, Vol 6, Issue 369 (?yvind Lode)<br> 5. Re: Possible bug with ntpd and Iptables (D. D. Brierton)<br> 6. Setting webmin on startup for FC1 (usmany at excite.com)<br> 7. Re: kopete and Yahoo! (Richard Whitney)<br> 8. Re: Problems with SCSI controller and sym53c8xx module<br> (Cokey de Percin)<br> 9.!
Re: Possible bug with ntpd and Iptables (Yang Xiao)<br> 10. Re: advansys scsi == ouch (John McBride)<br> 11. Re: Possible bug with ntpd and Iptables (Markku Kolkka)<br> 12. Re: Possible bug with ntpd and Iptables (Markku Kolkka)<br> 13. Re: kopete and Yahoo! (Mike Ramirez)<br> 14. RE: Setting webmin on startup for FC1 (Mike Kercher)<br> 15. Re: Setting webmin on startup for FC1 (Alexander Dalloz)<br> 16. Re: Setting webmin on startup for FC1 (Alexander Dalloz)<br> 17. Re: X support missing (Richard E Miles)<br> 18. Re: FTP (John Thompson)<br><br><br>----------------------------------------------------------------------<br><br>Message: 1<br>Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 23:51:45 +0300<br>From: Pasha <e97665728 at 013.net><br>Subject: Re: Loki games<br>To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com><br>Message-ID: <1093985505.3352.2.camel at localhost.localdomain><br>Content-Type: text/plain<br><br>On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 23:39, Mike Ramirez wrote:<br>> On Tue, 2004-!
08-31 at 13:35, Pasha wrote:<br>> > Hi,<br>> > <br>> > Does a!
nyone ha
ve any information about problems with games ported by<br>> > Loki and newest kernels? Any idea how these crashes may be resolved? I<br>> > tried the workarounds mentioned in new kernel announcement, but it<br>> > didn't help.<br>> > <br>> > Thanks.<br>> <br>> The best solution is to boot to the 2.6.7 kernels. I tried a few given<br>> in this newsletter and thats the best one. <br>Do you know any other solution? Any idea what kernel change caused the<br>problem? Also, should we report this to bugzilla?<br><br>Pavel.<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 2<br>Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 13:58:28 -0700<br>From: Mike Ramirez <mike at thexxxhost.com><br>Subject: Re: kopete and Yahoo!<br>To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com><br>Message-ID: <1093985908.4681.26.camel at gmike.5150wtwm.com><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br><br>On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 12:11, Richard Whitney wrote:<br>> NE1 had any experience with!
kopete not accepting your Yahoo! login?<br><br>Yes its on the KDE forum for kopete. Yahoo likes to change the<br>protocol and has since June 24 or around there making the current<br>release for kopete in 3.2.2 unable to connect. The answer is two<br>things. <br><br>a. Get the cvs version thats updated nightly. This is the answer I<br>found on the forums. http://www.kde-forum.org/viewforum.php?f=7 <-- I<br>had a problem reolving this forum<br><br>b. What till the rpms for 3.3 hit the mirrors, which should be soon<br>since it was release yesterday.<br><br><br>-- <br>Mike Ramirez <mike at thexxxhost.com><br>-------------- next part --------------<br>A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>Name: not available<br>Type: application/pgp-signature<br>Size: 189 bytes<br>Desc: This is a digitally signed message part<br>Url : /archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040831/242a541a/attachment.bin<br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 3<br>Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:13:!
10 -0700<br>From: Mike Ramirez <mike at thexxxhost.com><br>Subje!
ct: Re:
Lo
ki games<br>To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com><br>Message-ID: <1093986789.13338.3.camel at gmike.5150wtwm.com><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br><br>On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 13:51, Pasha wrote:<br>> On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 23:39, Mike Ramirez wrote:<br>> > On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 13:35, Pasha wrote:<br>> > > Hi,<br>> > > <br>> > > Does anyone have any information about problems with games ported by<br>> > > Loki and newest kernels? Any idea how these crashes may be resolved? I<br>> > > tried the workarounds mentioned in new kernel announcement, but it<br>> > > didn't help.<br>> > > <br>> > > Thanks.<br>> > <br>> > The best solution is to boot to the 2.6.7 kernels. I tried a few given<br>> > in this newsletter and thats the best one. <br>> Do you know any other solution? Any idea what kernel change caused the<br>> problem? Also, should we report this to bugzilla?<br>> <br>> Pavel.<br>> <br>> <br>-- <br>No, I believe its a kernel bug in 2.!
6.8 not a fedora problem. Can<br>someone confirm this? Any Idea well I would think it has to do with the<br>same bug affecting CD Burning becuase of the read write access for the<br>CDs as mountted isos. Thats only a guess but the only thing I can think<br>of. No real errors pop up either.<br><br><br>Mike Ramirez <mike at thexxxhost.com><br>-------------- next part --------------<br>A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>Name: not available<br>Type: application/pgp-signature<br>Size: 189 bytes<br>Desc: This is a digitally signed message part<br>Url : /archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040831/221bbb02/attachment.bin<br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 4<br>Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 23:12:54 +0200<br>From: ?yvind Lode <o-lode at online.no><br>Subject: RE: fedora-list Digest, Vol 6, Issue 369<br>To: <fedora-list at redhat.com><br>Cc: webid at cfl.rr.com<br>Message-ID: <000001c48f9f$48a484d0$0501a8c0 at winxp><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br><br>On Tu!
e, 2004-08-31 at 14:23, Øyvind Lode wrote:<br><br>> This wor!
k just f
ine but he is worried by the permissions on the file. <br>> The guestbook.txt file have the following permissions:<br>> -rwxr-xrw-<br>> <br>> Owner is the username of my friend and the groupowner is also my <br>> friend.<br>> <br>> He have heard someplace that having such a file world writeable is a <br>> security risk. He tells me that the file should not be writeable for <br>> everyone but it has to be or the php script fails I tell him...<br><br>> The only problem is that he doesn't remember how this was done and <br>> don't know either...<br>> <br>> How is this done by the Pro's?<br><br>: Not sure how the "Pro's" do it, but what you probably need to do is assign<br>group permissions on the file to the user that : php runs as. I think it is<br>the user apache runs as which on fedora is either apache or nobody. (I<br>think that depends on : if you installed from source or RPM<br>: files)<br><br>: Then you would need 770 permissions which mean the owner and the group<br>h!
ave read/write permissions and others (the world) : have no permissions on<br>that file.<br><br>: (770 translates to -rwxrwx---)<br><br>Hi<br><br>Yepp Yepp!!!<br>This did the trick :-)<br><br>Changed group owner to apache (which is the user and group my apache runs<br>under)<br>Did'nt find any user/group in the php.conf file so it looks like it using<br>the same user as the web server - like you said.<br><br>I changed the permission to 770 and tested the guestbook and everything<br>works just fine.<br><br>Thanks<br><br>-Øyvind<br><br><br><br><br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 5<br>Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 22:16:05 +0100<br>From: "D. D. Brierton" <darren at dzr-web.com><br>Subject: Re: Possible bug with ntpd and Iptables<br>To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com><br>Message-ID: <1093986965.4064.126.camel at excession.dzr><br>Content-Type: text/plain<br><br>On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 21:29, Yang Xiao wrote:<br><br>> Well, I guess you can call !
it a bug, but it's not difficult to do a<br>> iptables-save >!
/etc/sy
sc
onfig/iptables or even manually add the ntp<br>> rules to the iptables file<br>> to permenantly store the ntp rules before you start to make changes so<br>> that it won't get lost when you restart iptables?<br><br>Yang, I think you're missing Scot's point. It's not about difficulty,<br>it's about discoverability. Someone who has FC on a server that has<br>quite long uptimes might be mystified as to why the clock is completely<br>inaccurate despite their running ntpd because they didn't realise that<br>restarting iptables had firewalled it off.<br><br>I myself am happy for services to "punch holes" through the firewall<br>when they start up as long as iptables is somehow made aware of this<br>fact, so that if it has to be restarted it doesn't suddenly firewall all<br>those services off.<br><br>Best, Darren<br><br>-- <br>=====================================================================<br>D. D. Brierton darren at dzr-web.com www.dzr-web.com<br> Tryi!
ng is the first step towards failure (Homer Simpson)<br>=====================================================================<br><br><br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 6<br>Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 17:23:52 -0400 (EDT)<br>From: "" <usmany at excite.com><br>Subject: Setting webmin on startup for FC1<br>To: fedora-list-request at redhat.com<br>Cc: fedora-list at redhat.com<br>Message-ID: <20040831212352.33D0529A11 at xprdmailfe22.nwk.excite.com><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br><br><br><br>Hi guys,<br><br>Please how can I set up webmin on startup for FC1? also, how can I set DHCP, Internet Connection Sharing on same i.e. FC1 Box?<br><br>Thank you<br><br>NB. I am new on this forum and new with Linux (Fedora).<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com<br>The most personalized portal on the Web!<br><br><br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 7<br>Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:25:20 -07!
00<br>From: Richard Whitney <xenddev at gmail.com><br>Subject: R!
e: kopet
e and Yahoo!<br>To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com><br>Message-ID: <33fcdf4304083114253c99ce3 at mail.gmail.com><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII<br><br>Installed kopete 3.3.0 - it still launches 3.2.2 - What do I do?<br><br>Thanks!<br><br>On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 13:58:28 -0700, Mike Ramirez <mike at thexxxhost.com> wrote:<br>> <br>> <br>> On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 12:11, Richard Whitney wrote:<br>> > NE1 had any experience with kopete not accepting your Yahoo! login?<br>> <br>> Yes its on the KDE forum for kopete. Yahoo likes to change the<br>> protocol and has since June 24 or around there making the current<br>> release for kopete in 3.2.2 unable to connect. The answer is two<br>> things.<br>> <br>> a. Get the cvs version thats updated nightly. This is the answer I<br>> found on the forums. http://www.kde-forum.org/viewforum.php?f=7 <-- I<br>> had a problem reolving this forum<br>> <br>> b. What till the rpms for 3.3 hit the mirrors, which!
should be soon<br>> since it was release yesterday.<br>> <br>> --<br>> Mike Ramirez <mike at thexxxhost.com><br>> <br>> <br>> --<br>> fedora-list mailing list<br>> fedora-list at redhat.com<br>> To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>><br><br><br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 8<br>Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 17:25:33 -0400<br>From: Cokey de Percin <fdepercin at sc.rr.com><br>Subject: Re: Problems with SCSI controller and sym53c8xx module<br>To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com><br>Message-ID: <1093987533.1319.10.camel at gandolf.intra.net><br>Content-Type: text/plain<br><br>On Mon, 2004-08-30 at 11:50, C. Linus Hicks wrote:<br>> On Mon, 2004-08-30 at 10:24, Johan Totterman wrote:<br>> > Hello,<br>> > <br>> > I'm running FC 2 with a 2.6.8-1.521 kernel. <br>> > <br>> > My goal is to configure two or more Symbios Logic 53C875J PCI SCSI<br>> > controllers on my machine and run a couple of Unisys !
SCSI disk arrays<br>> > through them. <br>> > When I install !
only one
o
f the Symbios controllers, everything goes<br>> > smoothly, the sym53c8xx module loads beautifully and all my SCSI devices<br>> > are attached properly. <br>> > However, when I install a second Symbios card into my machine I run into<br>> > problems. I have tried all my tricks, but I still can't get throuh the<br>> > modprobe. <br>> > <br>> <br>> Have you verified that each SCSI adapter works properly when it is the<br>> only one in the system and in the slot you intend it to run in?<br>> <br>> The 2.6 kernel only comes with the new NCR53c8xx/SYM53c8xx family<br>> driver. Later versions of the 2.4 kernel had an old and new driver, so<br>> it's probably not an option for you to try the other driver. I would<br>> suggest that the evidence points toward a hardware problem. Also, have<br>> you tried having a properly terminated SCSI cable but no devices?<br>> -- <br>> C. Linus Hicks <lhicks at nc.rr.com><br><br>I've had problems with that driver also. I have a 2.4 kernel system<b!
r>that's been running smoothly for several years, but I have never been<br>able to get the V2 Symbios driver to work with it (dual Sym53C1010/33<br>controller). I haven't moved up to Fedora because of it. And yes I've<br>logged a bug report, but haven't seen any movement. I don't know if <br>this is a driver problem or a hardware problem that the old driver<br>ignored/worked around. I tend to believe the former.<br><br>Cokey <br><br>-- <br>------------------------------------------------------------------<br>F. 'Cokey' de Percin, DBA Email:<br>CSC Work - cdeperci at csc.com<br>Columbia, South Carolina Home - fdepercin at sc.rr.com<br><br><br>-- <br>This message has been scanned for viruses and<br>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is<br>believed to be clean.<br>Mailscanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.<br><br><br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 9<br>Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 17:28:21 -0400<br>From:!
Yang Xiao <yxiao2004 at gmail.com><br>Subject: Re: Possible bug!
with nt
pd and Iptables<br>To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com><br>Message-ID: <1cdafd0b040831142872d47bcd at mail.gmail.com><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII<br><br>On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 22:16:05 +0100, D. D. Brierton <darren at dzr-web.com> wrote:<br>> On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 21:29, Yang Xiao wrote:<br>> <br>> > Well, I guess you can call it a bug, but it's not difficult to do a<br>> > iptables-save > /etc/sysconfig/iptables or even manually add the ntp<br>> > rules to the iptables file<br>> > to permenantly store the ntp rules before you start to make changes so<br>> > that it won't get lost when you restart iptables?<br>> <br>> Yang, I think you're missing Scot's point. It's not about difficulty,<br>> it's about discoverability. Someone who has FC on a server that has<br>> quite long uptimes might be mystified as to why the clock is completely<br>> inaccurate despite their running ntpd because they didn't realise that<br>> restarting iptables had fir!
ewalled it off.<br>> <br>> I myself am happy for services to "punch holes" through the firewall<br>> when they start up as long as iptables is somehow made aware of this<br>> fact, so that if it has to be restarted it doesn't suddenly firewall all<br>> those services off.<br>> <br>> Best, Darren<br>> <br>as far as I'm aware of, this problem existed in RH9 or maybe even<br>earlier versions. I guess the ntp service start scripts was designed<br>to make life easier but created a situation where the user can lose<br>control when trying to customize.<br>As to the original post by Scott, I agree, It is a bug that there<br>isn't a hook in IPTABLES to check for what services needs to punch<br>holes when restarted. Mainly because they scripted in the service<br>startup scripts to do so. Otherwise, this is just a preference issue.<br><br>Yang<br><br><br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 10<br>Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:51:58 -0700<br>From: John McBride <jmcbride at cc!
is.com><br>Subject: Re: advansys scsi == ouch<br>To: For user!
s of Fed
or
a Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com><br>Message-ID: <4134F2FE.3090502 at ccis.com><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed<br><br>Paul Howarth wrote:<br><br>> <>On Mon, 2004-08-30 at 19:54, John McBride wrote<br>><br>>>Could it be that the chipset has unworkable flaws or something? There is <br>>>a popular network card that has a similar issue--the chipset itself has <br>>>a flaw that thrashes arp packets kind of at random. It "works" but it <br>>>certainly doesn't "work right". I recently pulled all of those out of <br>>>our boxes, too...they were in storage (thus free and available to me) <br>>>because the MS windows boxes had so many issues with them, they didn't <br>>>want them in those boxes.<br>>> <br>>><br>><br>>I don't think it's that; I just don't think they want to support a<br>>product they're not selling any more.<br>> <br>><br><br>That's the confusing part. They sell them through their website, and <br>list linux as being supported. A!
nnoying.<br><br>---<br>John<br><br><br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 11<br>Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 00:41:21 +0300<br>From: Markku Kolkka <markkukolkka at kolumbus.fi><br>Subject: Re: Possible bug with ntpd and Iptables<br>To: fedora-list at redhat.com<br>Message-ID: <200409010041.21676.markkukolkka at kolumbus.fi><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br><br>Scot L. Harris kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika tiistai, 31. <br>elokuuta 2004 22:41):<br>> If you stop and start iptables these ports are no longer open.<br>> I believe this would mean that ntp would stop working as<br>> expected.<br><br>No, the rule that accepts ESTABLISHED and RELATED packets lets <br>ntp work correctly in the usual client/server mode. Punching <br>holes in the firewall seems redundant, but in a previous <br>discussion somebody claimed that it is required if broadcast NTP <br>is used.<br><br>-- <br> Markku Kolkka<br> markku.kolkka at iki.fi<br><br><br><br><br>----------------!
--------------<br><br>Message: 12<br>Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 00!
:44:53 +
0300<br>From: Markku Kolkka <markkukolkka at kolumbus.fi><br>Subject: Re: Possible bug with ntpd and Iptables<br>To: fedora-list at redhat.com<br>Message-ID: <200409010044.53142.markkukolkka at kolumbus.fi><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br><br>Yang Xiao kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika keskiviikko, 1. <br>syyskuuta 2004 00:28):<br>> as far as I'm aware of, this problem existed in RH9 or maybe<br>> even earlier versions.<br><br>More accurately, it's a left-over from the days when RHL used <br>stateless firewalling. It's not a problem anymore with current <br>iptables scripts.<br><br>-- <br> Markku Kolkka<br> markku.kolkka at iki.fi<br><br><br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 13<br>Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:47:08 -0700<br>From: Mike Ramirez <mike at thexxxhost.com><br>Subject: Re: kopete and Yahoo!<br>To: Richard Whitney <xenddev at gmail.com>, For users of Fedora Core<br> releases <fedora-list at redhat.com><br>Message-ID: <1093988827.13338.13.camel at g!
mike.5150wtwm.com><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br><br>On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 14:25, Richard Whitney wrote:<br>> Installed kopete 3.3.0 - it still launches 3.2.2 - What do I do?<br>> <br>> Thanks!<br>> <br>> On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 13:58:28 -0700, Mike Ramirez <mike at thexxxhost.com> wrote:<br>> > <br>> > <br>> > On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 12:11, Richard Whitney wrote:<br>> > > NE1 had any experience with kopete not accepting your Yahoo! login?<br>> > <br>> > Yes its on the KDE forum for kopete. Yahoo likes to change the<br>> > protocol and has since June 24 or around there making the current<br>> > release for kopete in 3.2.2 unable to connect. The answer is two<br>> > things.<br>> > <br>> > a. Get the cvs version thats updated nightly. This is the answer I<br>> > found on the forums. http://www.kde-forum.org/viewforum.php?f=7 <-- I<br>> > had a problem reolving this forum<br>> > <br>> > b. What till the rpms for 3.3 hit the mirrors, which should be soon<br>> !
> since it was release yesterday.<br>> > <br>> > --<br>> > Mi!
ke Ramir
ez
<mike at thexxxhost.com><br>> > <br>> > <br>> > --<br>> > fedora-list mailing list<br>> > fedora-list at redhat.com<br>> > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list<br>> > <br>> > <br>> > <br>> ><br>Not sure haven't upgraded yet myself. But I would log into the cvs and<br>update my kopete that way. <br><br>I don't know the cvs login info, maybe someone on this list may. <br>-- <br>Mike Ramirez <mike at thexxxhost.com><br>-------------- next part --------------<br>A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>Name: not available<br>Type: application/pgp-signature<br>Size: 189 bytes<br>Desc: This is a digitally signed message part<br>Url : /archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040831/11cefea7/attachment.bin<br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 14<br>Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 16:47:55 -0500<br>From: "Mike Kercher" <mike at CamaroSS.net><br>Subject: RE: Setting webmin on startup for FC1<br>To: <usmany at excite.com>, "'For users of Fedora Core releases'"<br> <!
fedora-list at redhat.com><br>Message-ID: <200408312147.i7VLl34f023746 at avwall2.bladeware.com><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br><br>usmany at excite.com wrote:<br>> Hi guys,<br>> <br>> Please how can I set up webmin on startup for FC1? also, how can I<br>> set DHCP, Internet Connection Sharing on same i.e. FC1 Box? <br>> <br>> Thank you<br>> <br>> NB. I am new on this forum and new with Linux (Fedora).<br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com<br>> The most personalized portal on the Web!<br><br>chkconfig webmin on<br><br><br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 15<br>Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 23:53:30 +0200<br>From: Alexander Dalloz <alexander.dalloz at uni-bielefeld.de><br>Subject: Re: Setting webmin on startup for FC1<br>To: usmany at excite.com, For users of Fedora Core releases<br> <fedora-list at redhat.com><br>Message-ID: <1093989210.3881.218.camel at serendipity.dogma.lan><br>Content-Type: text/!
plain; charset="us-ascii"<br><br>Am Di, den 31.08.2004 schrie!
b usmany
@excite.com um 23:23:<br><br>> Please how can I set up webmin on startup for FC1? also, how can I set DHCP, Internet<br>> Connection Sharing on same i.e. FC1 Box?<br><br>chkconfig --level 235 webmin on<br><br>system-config-network<br><br>http://www.fedoranews.org/ghenry/gateway/<br><br>Alexander<br><br><br>-- <br>Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13<br>Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) kernel 2.6.8-1.521smp <br>Serendipity 23:51:20 up 1 day, 21:08, load average: 1.18, 1.31, 1.25 <br>-------------- next part --------------<br>A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>Name: not available<br>Type: application/pgp-signature<br>Size: 189 bytes<br>Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil<br>Url : /archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040831/25d12725/attachment.bin<br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 16<br>Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 23:57:22 +0200<br>From: Alexander Dalloz <alexander.dalloz at uni-bielefeld.de><br>Subject: Re: !
Setting webmin on startup for FC1<br>To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com><br>Message-ID: <1093989442.3881.220.camel at serendipity.dogma.lan><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br><br>Am Di, den 31.08.2004 schrieb Alexander Dalloz um 23:53:<br><br>> system-config-network<br><br>Sorry, on FC1 the tool has the name redhat-config-network, for setting<br>up DHCP.<br><br>Alexander<br><br><br>-- <br>Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13<br>Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) kernel 2.6.8-1.521smp <br>Serendipity 23:56:28 up 1 day, 21:13, load average: 1.65, 1.43,
Thank you guys with the help on howto set webmin to start up using command chkconfig webmin on and howto set internet connection sharing from syntax from site www.fedoranews.org by G. Henry or so.
on how I responded to this forum, I hope my respond syntax is right, if not, you are all free to correct me.
1.30 <br>-------------- next part --------------<br>A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>Name: not available<br>Type: application/pgp-signature<br>Size: 189 bytes<br>Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil<br>Url : /archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040831/9d4291d5/attachment.bin<br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 17<br>Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 15:05:32 -0700<br>From: Richard E Miles <r.godzilla at comcast.net><br>Subject: Re: X support missing<br>To: fedora-list at redhat.com<br>Message-ID: <20040831150532.0abd51b3.r.godzilla at comcast.net><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII<br><br>> Hi,<br>> <br>> I am using FC2 and trying to build Kaffe. It gives me the error "missing X<br>> support" while I run 'configure' before 'make'. Can somebody tell me how<br>> to install this component. Does this mean that I am missing only the<br>> source files for X? Because I can open X applications like Xterm. I looked<br>> for the directory X11 in /usr/!
includes, but it's not there. Also I<br>> couldn't find the file libXt.* in /usr/lib.<br>> <br>> Can somebody please help soon.<br>> <br>> Many thanks.<br><br>The libXt.* files are located in /usr/X11R6/lib. There is no /usr/X11 directory. Could this be an old kaffe?<br><br>-- <br>Richard E Miles<br>Federal Way WA.<br>registered linux user 46097<br><br><br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 18<br>Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 17:08:19 -0500<br>From: John Thompson <JohnThompson at new.rr.com><br>Subject: Re: FTP<br>To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com><br>Message-ID: <4134F6D3.3080801 at new.rr.com><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed<br><br>Adam Boettiger wrote:<br><br>> I'm not seeing where an FTP client is included in the current release of <br>> FC 2. Can anyone recommend a good one that I can yum for?<br><br>I see four ftp clients included on the FC2 CDs:<br><br> Fedora-core2-disk.1:ftp-0.17-19.i386.rpm<br> Fed!
ora-core2-disk.1:lftp-2.6.12-1.i386.rpm<br> Fedora-core2-di!
sk.1:ncf
tp-3.1.7-2.i386.rpm<br> Fedora-core2-disk.2:gftp-2.0.17-2.i386.rpm<br><br>Of these, I find ncftp to be the most useful.<br><br>-- <br><br>-John (john at os2.dhs.org)<br><br><br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>--<br>fedora-list mailing list<br>fedora-list at redhat.com<br>http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list<br><br><br>End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 6, Issue 371<br>*******************************************<br>
_______________________________________________
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list