kernel number doubt

[Brian Mury]

On Sun, 2004-09-19 at 20:34, Robert Locke wrote:
> There is a reason it is 2 point 6 point 8 dash 1 point 521.  The "dash"
> is the separator...
> 
> If you look at the changelog from this kernel you will see it is
> actually based on 2.6.8-rc4-bk3 from kernel.org....

You are right, I am wrong; I stand corrected. I assumed the 1 was for
2.6.8.1 - that's what I get for assuming.