Using apt dist-upgrade

Rahul Sundaram sundaram at redhat.com
Sat Apr 16 04:36:59 UTC 2005


Martín Marqués wrote:

>El Vie 15 Abr 2005 11:21, Matthew Miller escribió:
>  
>
>>On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 04:04:17PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>Wrong. apt4rpm is maintained (By Richard Bos and by me).
>>>      
>>>
>>Well, it is a confusing name.
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Apt-rpm has has less attention than before, because the principal apt-
>>>rpm maintainer is the author of smart. That does not mean apt-rpm is
>>>unmaintained. It's just that a person's focus has changed. 
>>>He just has released a new release, a couple of weeks ago.
>>>      
>>>
>>And said, at the time, "I also belive that this will be one of the last
>>APT-RPM releases I do."
>>    
>>
>
>But anyone can keep the project working. That's what OSS is for. :-)
>
>  
>
yes, but the project does require consider expertise and time. so its 
not for everyone. Its not just a matter of flexibility of licensing

regards
Rahul





More information about the fedora-list mailing list