get rid of old kernels
Mark Sargent
powderkeg at snow.email.ne.jp
Tue Apr 19 14:09:56 UTC 2005
Paul Howarth wrote:
> Gordon Keehn wrote:
>
>> Jeff Vian wrote:
>>
>>> As someone has already said it has been discussed several times, but
>>> for
>>> this use, rpm is much nicer than yum.
>>>
>>>
>> And apt (synaptic) is even nicer. I keep the highest level kernel
>> and the next highest stable version as a backup. When I request that
>> synaptic install a new kernel, at the same time I remove the old
>> version. Grub and the /lib directory subtree are cleaned up
>> automagically. OK, I know it's rpm that does the dirty deed under
>> the covers, but synaptic makes it a lot easier to manage multiple
>> kernel versions in a consistent fashion.
>
>
> You remove the old kernel (and its modules) whilst you're still
> running it?
>
> Paul.
>
Hi All,
I'm guessing he's not talking about the one he's currently using, but
the backup that would then become backup 2 if he kept it. Yes..? Cheers.
Mark Sargent.
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list