[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: bind problem



Am Do, den 07.04.2005 schrieb List um 13:56:

> Weird. I have the zone entry for anonns.com binding to advanced.anonns.com 
> as follows:-
> 
> ;Begin of file anonns.com
> $TTL 86400
> @       IN      SOA     advanced.anonns.com. postmaster.anonns.com. (
>                         2005040301
>                         3600
>                         7200
>                         864000
>                         86400 )
> 
>                                 IN      NS          advanced.anonns.com.
>                                 IN      NS          brilliance.anonns.com.
> 
>                                 IN      MX     5    advanced.anonns.com.
> 
>                                  IN      A           203.208.228.152
> ftp                             IN      A           203.208.228.152
> mail                           IN      A           203.208.228.152
> pop                           IN      A           203.208.228.152
> www                         IN      CNAME       anonns.com.
> advanced                   IN      A           203.208.228.152
> brilliance                    IN      A           203.208.228.153

Both nameservers in the same subnet? Is it just the German DENIC which
demands that the second NS has to be located in a different net or is
that a global requirement? At least it is highly recommended.

Alexander


-- 
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773
legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html
Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.10-1.771_FC2smp 
Serendipity 15:10:28 up 8 days, 12:36, load average: 0.47, 0.47, 0.45 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]