What is the official/semi-official positon of Fedora on KDE?

[Claude Jones]

Pete wrote:
> I am using kde-3.4. I cannot say that there are any
> huge differences or apparent improvements, from a
> user's perspective. They have integrated amarok into
> the konqueror sidebar, for one (not that I ever use
> that - better just to open amarok and have a clean
> display when I want to listen to music, and have
> konqueror free to do other things). I imagine it must
> be primarily a bug-fix issue, but there weren't any
> bugs I had come across, that I recall.
> 
> The huge gains (laud! laud!) came when I switched from
> the standard fedora kde to the kde-redhat project
> version of 3.4. Wow! For the first time since the ol'
> redhat daze, the system works like it's supposed to.
> Click on a file and there's music, instead of noatun
> hanging up and kaboodle jamming. There's video, so you
> can watch mpg movies and rent dvds and not have to use
> windows. What's an option to windows worth if you
> can't use it for all your needs? I don't need windows
> and don't use it at all, but only because everything
> works in Linux. There are lots of little things like
> this - I can't remember them all - everything just
> works, all of it! I can't say it enough. It's so good,
> for the first time in years, I'm tempted not to
> upgrade to FC4 (yes, I know I'm dreaming, of course I
> will upgrade, and on the first day possible, but not
> until kde-redhat is ready).
> 

Thank you - this is some meat! I presume I can search on KDE-redhat and 
find this iteration?

-- 
Claude Jones
Bluemont, VA, USA