[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Netgear PS101 configuration...



Am Mo, den 11.04.2005 schrieb Reinhard Sy um 15:54:

> > > Hah, not so simple - beware the Netgear PS110 - it doesn't play nicely 
> > > with firewalls and iptables due to an unconventional use of port 
> > > numbers. (See http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.guarddog/825 and 
> > > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=133064)
> > > 
> > > If you are running a firewall on your computer, expect trouble.
> > 
> > You are right. You find a thread in this list's archive where I
> > contribute an analyze and solution. I agree that the way the Netgear
> > acts is incompatible with the default iptables setup as the TCP
> > sequences it sends are not recognized as ESTABLISHED or RELATED.
> > 
> For me the same trouble since FC3. Turning of iptables makes it usable -
> but this can not be the solution!
> 
> Reinhard

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fedora-list&m=110281479416544&w=2

Alexander


-- 
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773
legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html
Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.10-1.771_FC2smp 
Serendipity 16:01:30 up 12 days, 13:27, load average: 0.12, 0.13, 0.17 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]