On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 13:11 -0400, Reuben D. Budiardja wrote:
Could you elaborate more how the backup mx could be any more of a "spam magnet" then the main MX ? I am interested to learn.
Spammers target backup mx on the premise that it usually lacks the filtering of primary mx.
Jim Seymour explains it better that I could at http://jimsun.linxnet.com/misc/postfix-anti-UCE.txt
It's about two-thirds of the way down the page titled "When There's No> Point To A Secondary MX."