[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Fedora Core brevity vs server upgrades



On 4/28/05, rado <rado rivers-bend com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 13:32 +0800, John Summerfied wrote:
> > > I'd not use FC on a server.
> > >
[snip]
> >
> > > If you want a Red Hat-based solution then look at the free download
> > > versions of RH's Enterprise Linux. I have not used one, but I might. I
> > > have been downloading the source updates, and they're relatively few as
> > > compared with FC.
> Free RHEL?????????? ok...it's pretty early for me here in Louisiana but
> I am getting to feel like a mushroom...being kept in the dark and fed
> chit. Wow I have never heard of this now!
> >
> > Agreed. Centos looks a good bet.

RedHat plays by the rules and releases source.  Several different
distrobution use these to clone RHEL.  The most popular seems to be
CentOS (http://www.centos.org/).

-- 
Leonard Isham, CISSP 
Ostendo non ostento.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]