Archiving Data Permanently

[Mike McCarty]

Reuben D. Budiardja wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 August 2005 16:13, Mike McCarty wrote:
> 
>>Reuben D. Budiardja wrote:
>>

[snip]

>>Evenutally, a tape system will probably be more economical.

[snip]

> For our 'active' data that change all the time, I use rsnapshot to a backup 
> machine. It'd be nice to be able to take every one or two month snapshot and 
> put it in a more permanent medium. But I am not sure if I can do that easily 
> and economically with about ~200GB data.

I reiterate, a tape system will probably be more economical in
the long run.

Mike
-- 
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!