should this list be subscribed to f-announce-l?

[Karsten Wade]

On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 20:37 -0500, Mike Klinke wrote:

> I suspect that people who are interested in these announcements 
> would be better served by a simple, periodic, note to the lists 
> that an "announcement list" exists and directions to it.  This 
> periodic note should also be sent to fedora-devel, fedora-test, the 
> official fedora support web forum, and other fedora-related lists 
> too.  Otherwise, sending everything to this list will only serve to 
> annoy 100% of those who aren't interested in these announcements.   

Yes, this exact thing is done already, and for some time.

This is one of the reasons I wondered, is if people are not catching the
fact that there is an announce list.

> Out of curiosity how many subscribers are there in each of this, and 
> the fedora-announce list?

IIRC, I last heard >10,000 on the announce list.  I'd reckon that this
list probably has much more than that.

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint:  2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115    5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41   
                       Red Hat SELinux Guide
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050819/307832bb/attachment-0001.sig>