Keychain works on tty, but not in Gnome

[Alexander Dalloz]

Am Di, den 23.08.2005 schrieb Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu um 0:04:

> Ah!  Thanks for the help: I finally understand what's going on.
> 
> I used your reply to run a few google searches, and came up with the
> following hit:
> 
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2005-August/msg01256.html
> 
> Which I then used to refine my search a little more, and got this:
> 
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2005-August/msg00215.html
> 
> And that helped me to understand what's going on.  However, why has this
> changed in the first place?

Do you have a diff for what changed with X init?

> > Please see the
> > README.Fedora text file in the docs of the package, as the package has
> > an opt-in mechanism which is not part of the upstream version.
> 
> Besides that change, are there any other changes with the Fedora version
> of Keychain from upstream?

The only (main) difference between the upstream keychain rpm and the
package made by me for Fedora Extras is, that the FE package ships with
the opt-in mechanism. That means 2 shell scripts which will reside in
/etc/profile.d/ as keychain.sh and keychain.csh and which allow the user
to easily invoke keychain activity by a ~/.keychainrc file. Though it is
still possible to add the keychain call within ~/.bash_profile.

> Ranbir

Alexander


-- 
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773
legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html
Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.35_FC2smp 
Serendipity 00:12:39 up 20:56, 16 users, 0.19, 0.23, 0.19 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050823/d54f1df0/attachment-0001.sig>