Rehashing My File Permissions Understanding(or lack of it)
akonstam at trinity.edu
akonstam at trinity.edu
Tue Aug 23 13:48:46 UTC 2005
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 08:09:31AM -0500, Jay Paulson wrote:
> I was under the impression that changing the umask was a possible
> security risk. Am I correct in thinking that?
>
> jay
Whether it is a security risk depends on what permissions you can
tolerate on your files. But a reminder. Setting the umask only limits
the minimum permissions a file can have. It does not legislate that
the all files have that level of permissions. It can be more secure
than the umask states.
>
> On Aug 23, 2005, at 4:06 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
>
> >Mark Sargent wrote:
> >>expanding on this a little...when I set the dir to g+s it makes every
> >>file saved in the dir have the group's permissions, allowing everyone
> >>access, but, how does one set a particular dir so that any file saved
> >>to it, has particular permissions, like say, rwxrwxr--? Now, when I
> >>save a new file to the dir, it saves as the default permissions,
> >>rw-r--r--.
> >
> >You can't. You'd have to change your umask from 022 to 002 to do this,
> >and it would affect all files/directories you created, not just the
> >ones in that directory.
> >
> >Paul.
> >
> >--
> >fedora-list mailing list
> >fedora-list at redhat.com
> >To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> >
>
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
--
=======================================================================
Acting is not very hard. The most important things are to be able to laugh
and cry. If I have to cry, I think of my sex life. And if I have to laugh,
well, I think of my sex life.
-- Glenda Jackson
-------------------------------------------
Aaron Konstam
Computer Science
Trinity University
telephone: (210)-999-7484
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list