Yum dependencies [still]

Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
Thu Dec 22 19:04:04 UTC 2005

On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 01:21, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > I really don't care whose fault it might be.
> It actually is quite simple: Current livna's packaging/update strategy
> puts the rpm dependencies into an inconsistent state, i.e. this is a
> packaging bug.

If livna doesn't make a change, how can a problem be their fault?

> >  If you're going to provide 
> > an update, then the update should be complete, with any dependencies 
> > required.
> Yes. Fact is, livna's strategies breaks this rule.

How could they possibly have any other strategy?  The only solution
would be to hold back kernel releases until the dependent
modules are available.

  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell at gmail.com

More information about the fedora-list mailing list