Why questions don't get answered, or "No, I've already RTFM, tell me the answer!"

Arthur Pemberton pemboa at gmail.com
Fri Dec 30 03:06:48 UTC 2005


On 12/29/05, Kam Leo <kam.leo at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 12/29/05, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram at redhat.com> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > >>I am not advocating the taking down of these sites. I have no
> > >>financial interest and nothing to gain by doing so. Red Hat does.
> > >>Changing the domain names of unofficial sites will become or is an
> > >>issue since the marketing types have embarked upon a fedora*.org
> > >>naming scheme.
> > >>
> > >>
> > What are you advocating to resolve that?.
> >
>
> Here are two of many possible options:
>
> 1. The Fedora Core legel beagle should respectfully ask each of the
> unofficial sites to desist from using fedora*.org naming scheme.



What is the reasoning for doing this at all? What are the cons of these
websites' existence?

--
As a boy I jumped through Windows, as a man I play with Penguins.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20051229/72f5b595/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the fedora-list mailing list