Why questions don't get answered, or "No, I've already RTFM, tell me the answer!"
mike.mccarty at sbcglobal.net
Fri Dec 30 04:20:45 UTC 2005
> From: "Rahul Sundaram" <sundaram at redhat.com>
>> jdow wrote:
>>> From: "Rahul Sundaram" <sundaram at redhat.com>
>>>> There is no beta releases for Fedora. Only test releases.
>>> A rose by any other name would smell as sweet - or bad.
>> You miss the point obviously. Beta releases have a very different
>> meaning from test releases. Test releases are snapshots of the current
>> development tree at that point with a limited development freeze and
>> there are three test releases before the final release with
>> significant number of updates in between them. Beta releases on the
>> other hand are close to the final releases and is the second stage
>> after a internal/private alpha release.
> Oy! So they are post-alpha releases or pre-alpha? Methinks me sees
> now that they are pretty darned early in the cycle from rawhide to
> a formal FedoraCore release.
From the perspective of FC being upstream of RHEL, they are
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
More information about the fedora-list