is evolution really dependent on spamassassin?
John Summerfied
debian at herakles.homelinux.org
Sat Dec 31 14:36:30 UTC 2005
Tim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't use spamassassin, I find it more of a hindrance than a help, so
> I wanted to remove it.
>
> yum remove spamassassin
> ...[snip]...
> =============================================================================
> Package Arch Version Repository Size
> =============================================================================
> Removing:
> spamassassin i386 3.0.4-2.fc4 installed 1.8 M
> Removing for dependencies:
> evolution i386 2.2.3-2.fc4 installed 24 M
>
> And trying "rpm -e spamassassin" produces the same sort of response.
>
> Surely this is a stupid dependency? It's supposedly *optional* whether
> you use anti-spam filtering in Evolution (I've never allowed it's junk
> mail checking), why should it *have* to be present?
>
So you _can_ use the filtering.
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
1aaaaaaa at computerdatasafe.com.au Z1aaaaaaa at computerdatasafe.com.au
Tourist pics http://portgeographe.environmentaldisasters.cds.merseine.nu/
do not reply off-list
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list