Why questions don't get answered, or "No, I've already RTFM, tell me the answer!"
olivares14031 at yahoo.com
Sat Dec 31 15:52:25 UTC 2005
--- Arthur Pemberton <pemboa at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/30/05, Antonio Olivares
> <olivares14031 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Ok! We can still get all the goodies, no problem
> > little bit of work. I can live with that, but
> > people want the cake and eat it too. Thank you
> > the explanation. I thought that the Fedora
> > upon release from Red Hat's grip, would allow for
> > inclusion of the programs that could not be added
> > because of licensing issues.
> Users who want everything so neatly and conviently
> packaged should pony up
> cash to pay for the non-free things they wish to
> enjoy. And in all fairness,
> by the graces of the guys at Livna and ATrpms, all
> these free things can
> easily be added to a fresh install.
> Do I sense some Red Hat dislike in your tone?
Not at all. Red Hat sponsors Fedora which I like and
all those things I can get on my own. I personally do
not mind going through other packages and getting what
I want and configure the system to my liking. It was
an honest question which many people ask and they do
not get a clear answer.
> > > By the way is this the longest thread of the
> > > or
> > > > will it be Peter Whalley,
> > > > Enquiring minds want to know.
> > > ----
> > > who cares?
> > Just a curiosity! No damage or hard feelings
> > intended. :)
> I think it is fair to say this is not the longest
> thread. Earlier this
> year there was a thread about top posting and other
> bad list practices, that
> thread was very long if I remember correctly.
Yes, but this one is not too far behind.
> > > Craig
> > >
> As a boy I jumped through Windows, as a man I play
> with Penguins.
> > --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe:
Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year.
More information about the fedora-list