FC3 and NTFS

[James Wilkinson]

Loren Lockwood wrote:
> Good idea, Duncan.  Actually I do have a spare partition which I could
> use exactly in that way.  The only real reason I am using NTFS under W2K
> is that it is apparently more stable than FAT32.  I have had BIG
> problems with FAT32 in the past (under W98SE).

I think that has more to do with Windows 98 than FAT32. When it's
stable, it's reasonably stable. When it isn't, you've got a real problem
trying to sort out what the problem is.

Note that despite the names, Windows 98 and Windows 2000 are *very*
different creatures. I have had no problems with FAT 32 on either
Windows 2000 or Linux.

James.

-- 
James Wilkinson       | You will stop at nothing to reach your objective,
Exeter    Devon    UK | but only because your brakes are defective.
E-mail address: james | 
@westexe.demon.co.uk  |