Regression? in USB support w/r/t libusb
Edward
edward at tripled.iinet.net.au
Mon Feb 7 06:40:55 UTC 2005
Thomas Frayne wrote:
> Kernel developer's, if you don't think this is a kernel regression,
> please ignore this note.
>
> In FC3, with kernel 2.6.9-1.715_FC3smp, I hotplugged a formatted mini
> external hard drive in a new enclosure into a USB 2.0 hub. I expected
> to find its device node, but could not find it in my maze of USB
> devices. I might have searched further, but, instead, I unplugged it,
> and plugged it into another PC running FC1, with kernel 2.4.22-1.2174.
> I expected to have to reboot to see it, but hotplug worked, and I found
> the hard drive in the Hardware Browser, mounted its partitions, and used
> NFS to copy data into the FC3 machine.
>
> FC1 provided me an easy way to find the device node for a hotplugged USB
> hard drive, but I found no such easy way in FC3. Is this a regression,
> or is there an easy way that I missed?
>
> I am sending this note to both the Fedora mailing list and the kernel
> mailing list to find out where the regression is, if any.
>
This is certainly not the right place to post this kind of thing. I
doubt there are too many (if any) kernel programmers on this list and if
there are, I don't even think your problem has anything to do with the
kernel per se anyway.
Make sure you run up2date to correct the HAL and udev bugs, and if you
still have trouble, and there is no open ticket for your problem on
bugzilla, then please enter a new bug report at bugzilla regarding your
problem.
Regards,
Ed.
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list