RHEL redistribution..
WipeOut
wipe_out at users.sourceforge.net
Wed Feb 16 12:45:51 UTC 2005
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 11:21:19 +0000, WipeOut
><wipe_out at users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
>
>>I have a question that may or may not have come up before... Not wanting
>>to start a flame war but its something that I was asked and didn't have
>>an answer to..
>>
>>Is RHEL allowed to be freely distributed and installed on as many PC's
>>as you like as is the case with other GPL distro's??
>>
>>
>
>the code is licensed under various open source license. so yes the
>code is freely redistributable. redhat has trademark restrictions so
>anyone redistributing it will have to strip off redhat names and
>trademarks from the end product which is basically what rebuild clones
>like centos(.org) does.
>
>the trademark restrictions are necessary for two things
>
>* prevent confusion
>* to protect the trademark from being diluated and lost
>
>
>
Ok.. So the simple answer to the question is that RHEL is
redistributable provided the RedHat trademarks are removed meaning that
a copy (copied CD or ISO image) of original RHEL is not permitted to be
redistributed because the RedHat trademarks would still be in place..
Does that sound about right?
Thanks
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list