Comments on bug 140214 - the removal of X utilities?
Giulio Sorrentino
numerone.fedora at wooow.it
Mon Feb 21 19:41:17 UTC 2005
Bryan Ischo wrote:
>Hi all. I'd like to ask if anyone has any comments on bugzilla bug
>140214. This bug is in regards to the removal in Fedora Core of the X
>utility programs xbiff, xmessage, and xcalc. Are there Fedora Core
>developers on this list who can comment?
>
>The gist of the problem is that one developer, Mike A. Harris, has decided
>to remove these programs from the xorg-x11 RPM. He has never given any
>reason for doing so and it can only be surmised that be believes that
>these programs are superfluous, presumably because he doesn't use them.
>
>The number of users of these programs is probably not terribly large, but
>then again, the size of these programs and the difficulty in maintaining
>them is incredibly small (they have been a part of the base X system for
>about 20 years now and as far as I know there has not been a bug or
>maintaince issue with these programs in 20 years!).
>
Probably you have respond to yourself.
>Mike A. Harris seems unwilling to consider the needs of users with respect
>to this issue. He has simply decreed that these programs shall no longer
>be in Fedora Core and gives no reason for this. I can appreciate wanting
>to "clean up" and remove programs which are no longer useful, but these
>programs *are* useful, at least to some users, and furthermore, they add
>only literally a couple of hundred K (at most) to the distribution.
>
>He has suggested that the X.org software will be removing these programs
>from its core system in the future. Perhaps that is true, but why not
>wait until *then* to remove them from Fedora Core? Why pre-emptively
>remove them without providing for any other place to put them? Why not
>create a new small optional RPM called X-old-utils or something like that?
>
>
This should be the most sensate solution to problem.
> And why not wait until the X.org project decides to remove these programs
>to do that? The simple fact is that it has taken MORE maintainance work
>to prematurely remove these programs, for no apparent reason, than it ever
>did to just leave them in. And it in no way satisfies any user to have
>these programs removed nor does it improve the Fedora Core distribution.
>
>
If nobody use them why they should increase packet's size?
>The most frustrating thing is that Mike A. Harris simply gives no reason
>for removing them, and seems to refuse to respond to user's pleas to leave
>these insignificant programs in the x11-xorg RPM. All that is necessary
>to put these programs back in is the removal of two or three comment
>characters that Mike A. Harris added to the spec file. That's it. Why
>won't he do this?
>
>
This is absolutely THE worst mode for acting...
>Are these decisions made by a collective of developers at Fedora or is it
>all the work of just one person? If there is collective input on this,
>can I please hear some thoughts from other developers? If it's the work
>of just one person, can I please at least hear a reasonable explanation
>from that person about why this has been done?
>
>
I think that everyman should response on his actions when somebody asks...
>The bug has been closed as WONTFIX but I'm really hoping that the needs of
>users can be heard here and that we can get this issue sorted out.
>
>Thank you, and best wishes,
>Bryan
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Bryan Ischo bryan at ischo.com N, R, 6
>New York, NY, USA http://www.ischo.com RedHat Linux 7.3
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list