Difficulty getting a large disk mounted
Matt Considine
matt at considine.net
Tue Feb 22 02:31:32 UTC 2005
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:13:24 -0700
> From: Craig White <craigwhite at azapple.com>
> Subject: Re: Difficulty getting a large disk mounted.
> To: fedora-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <1109031204.5261.8.camel at lin-workstation.azapple.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 18:22 -0500, Matt Considine wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>I've checked the archives and cannot find commentary on this. Hoping I
>>didn't overlook something, here goes ...
>>
>>Running FC3 and Gnome, I am trying to get a third harddisk recognized.
>>This one had a partition (11G) for the Win99 OS and the remaining
>>partition was divided up into virtual drives. Total size is 60G if I
>>recall.
>>
>>The hardware brower recognizes this as
>>
>> Device Start End Size(MB) Type
>>/dev/hdd
>> /hdd1 1 1460 11453 fat32
>> 1 1460 11453 Free space
>> /hdd2 1461 7296 45779 No filesystem
>> 7297 7298 10 Free space
>>
>>These are associated with subdirectories, respectively,
>> /mnt/boot
>> /mnt/root
>>
>>I can see the files on "boot" without a problem. But I cannot
>>see the files on "root".
>>
>>Can someone either tell me how or point me to the instructions to get
>>these files recognized? When I type (as root)
>>
>> mount -t vfat /dev/hdd2 /mnt/root
>>
>>I get the following message :
>> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hdd2,
>> or too many mounted file systems
>>
>>Any help would be appreciated, as well as everyone's patience if I
>>missed something simple.
>
> -----
> I guess I don't understand exactly what you are saying.
>
> I can see that there is a partition /dev/hdd2 but I don't understand
> your comment about the rest of the the partition being divided into
> virtual drives.
>
> Then you say that you called these things /mnt/boot and /mnt/root
> but /dev/hdd1 is fat32 so that hardly qualifies as a suitable partition
> for a linux boot and /dev/hdd2 - at least on appearance doesn't have a
> suitable filesystem at all. The free space leftovers seem to indicate
> some type of funky partitioning tool was used. I am gathering that if
> you did try to install a filesystem (sometimes called 'formatting' or
> 'initializing') that it didn't succeed.
>
> If there is no valuable data on the /dev/hdd2, you could probably just
> from command line...
>
> mkfs -t [ext3|ext2|vfat] /dev/hdd2
>
> I always had problems creating vfat partitions larger than 32mb. Perhaps
> that is just me.
>
> if you feel that you had indeed created a filesystem on /dev/hdd2 like
> in Windows or something else and indeed have valuable data on that
> drive, then re-examine by booting Windows or the tool you used to create
> it and see if it's still there.
>
> Craig
(apologies for the format of the prior response...)
It appears that the other harddisk was formatted using "EZ-Drive". A
Google search doesn't seem to show anything discussing FC3's ability to
co-exist with this. Other than putting it into another system, booting,
etc, etc, are there ideas? (Installing an NTFS driver was -
predictably - of no help).
Matt
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list