yum vs system-config-package

[Wong Kwok-hon]

On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:19:37 +0000, Paul Howarth <paul at city-fan.org> wrote:
> Wong Kwok-hon wrote:
> > On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 14:20:32 +0000, Paul Howarth <paul at city-fan.org> wrote:
> >>On Sat, 2005-01-29 at 23:12 +0800, Wong Kwok-hon wrote:
> >>>On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:38:29 +0000, Paul Howarth <paul at city-fan.org> wrote:
> >>>>Add/Remove packages (system-config-packages) gets confused once you've
> >>>>updated packages to errata versions (e.g. by doing "yum update"). You're
> >>>>better off just sticking with yum.
> >>>
> >>>Hello!
> >>>
> >>>That means yum and system-config-packages have a compatible problem ?
> >>>What should I do if I want to install packages ? User Yum or
> >>>system-config-packages ?
> >>
> >>I would just use yum if I was you.
> >
> >
> > But why not make them sync. together?
> 
> That would the thing to do but at the moment there is a problem with
> system-config-packages, which is why I suggest sticking to yum for the
> time being.
> 
> In FC4 there may well be a yum-based tool that completely replaces
> system-config-packages anyway.
> 
> Paul.

Thats a good idea but how to install the package from CD ?

Wong Kwok Hon