FC3 sucks. It takes up too much memory!

John R. Tomawski jtomawski at ibigroup.com
Tue Feb 1 20:08:42 UTC 2005


On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 09:24 -0600, linux.whiz at gmail.com wrote:

> On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 14:09:16 +0800, Edward Yang
> <neo_in_matrix at fastmail.fm> wrote:
> >  Okay, I found the anwser. The -Xmx option works. If I set it to -Xmx128,
> > then the memory value drops to about 310mb; if I set it to-Xmx64m, then the
> > memory value is about 250mb. I think it's CBX that is eating up too much
> > memory. 
> 
> So the issue is with your tool, not with the distribution then.
> 
> >  I feel sorry that I think it help prove 'FC3 sucks' topic. :-(
> 
> Um, no - it helps prove that you *are* a troll.  You've proven that it
> is a software application which is not even included with the
> distribution.  It's your choice of tools (and your attitude) that
> sucks, not FC3.
> 
> >  This is the end of this topic for me.
> 
> Thank God.  You've wasted enough of our time.  Go away, troll.

HAH
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050201/2aaa1cf5/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the fedora-list mailing list