FC3 sucks. It takes up too much memory!

[Leonardo Maguetas Devai]

I have heard that OO is written in Java too!
And I believed, because OO is so damn slow indeed :(

On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 10:13 -0600, Thomas Cameron wrote:

> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <akonstam at trinity.edu>
> To: "James Mckenzie" <jjmckenzie51 at earthlink.net>; "For users of Fedora Core 
> releases" <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 10:11 AM
> Subject: Re: FC3 sucks. It takes up too much memory!
> 
> 
> > On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 08:57:11AM -0700, James Mckenzie wrote:
> >> > > > James Mckenzie wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > I don't have those two options in jdk.config. I do find the following
> >> > options in cbulder.config:
> >> >
> >> > vmparam -Xms32m
> >> Minumum memory per load: 32MB
> >> > vmparam -Xmx256m
> >> Maximum memory per load: 256MB
> >> >
> >> > So I wonder why the JVM instance invoked by CBX takes up more than
> >> > 400mb memory?
> >> >
> >> This looks like a problem with either Java or Cbuilder and definately not 
> >> LINUX or FC.
> >>
> > But I hear from the usual unreliable sources that OpenOffice is
> > written in Java. So if OpenOffice is part of Fedora it seems to me its
> > a Fedora problem also. There is no question in my experience that an
> > installation of everything thing in the FC3 (or even FC2)
> > distribution) leads to a bloated system. And saying  XP systems after
> > SP2 are also bloated does not make me feel better.
> 
> I haven't heard that OO is written in Java.  Even if it is - one third-party 
> application does not make the whole distro suck.
> 
> Thomas 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050202/5738e0d0/attachment-0001.htm>