FC3 sucks. It takes up too much memory!

[Jeff Vian]

On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 14:17 -0200, Leonardo Maguetas Devai wrote:
> I have heard that OO is written in Java too!
> And I believed, because OO is so damn slow indeed :(
> 

If you believe OOo is written in Java it is easy to find out.
Use the source Leonardo.

I have not looked myself.

> On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 10:13 -0600, Thomas Cameron wrote: 
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: <akonstam at trinity.edu>
> > To: "James Mckenzie" <jjmckenzie51 at earthlink.net>; "For users of Fedora Core 
> > releases" <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 10:11 AM
> > Subject: Re: FC3 sucks. It takes up too much memory!
> > 
> > 
> > > On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 08:57:11AM -0700, James Mckenzie wrote:
> > >> > > > James Mckenzie wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > I don't have those two options in jdk.config. I do find the following
> > >> > options in cbulder.config:
> > >> >
> > >> > vmparam -Xms32m
> > >> Minumum memory per load: 32MB
> > >> > vmparam -Xmx256m
> > >> Maximum memory per load: 256MB
> > >> >
> > >> > So I wonder why the JVM instance invoked by CBX takes up more than
> > >> > 400mb memory?
> > >> >
> > >> This looks like a problem with either Java or Cbuilder and definately not 
> > >> LINUX or FC.
> > >>
> > > But I hear from the usual unreliable sources that OpenOffice is
> > > written in Java. So if OpenOffice is part of Fedora it seems to me its
> > > a Fedora problem also. There is no question in my experience that an
> > > installation of everything thing in the FC3 (or even FC2)
> > > distribution) leads to a bloated system. And saying  XP systems after
> > > SP2 are also bloated does not make me feel better.
> > 
> > I haven't heard that OO is written in Java.  Even if it is - one third-party 
> > application does not make the whole distro suck.
> > 
> > Thomas 
> > 
> -- 
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list